Edit: typo

    • @mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      It is fucking horrible with false positives though. RIP if you have a Kali ISO sitting on one of your drives.

      That and the Antimalware service executable gets hung up and chugs 30-50% of your CPU and RAM and won’t stop.

    • @ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      It’s way too reliant on their cloud infrastructure though, causing it to detect and react to malware slower than other solutions and it turns to shit the second the network disconnects. The PC security channel on YouTube has some good analysis of it.

      • Dettweiler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        To be honest, for most users, if they’re not on the Internet; it’s not that big of a deal for their antivirus to be less effective. Most threats come from being dumb on the web.

  • That thing literally saved Windows, as most users would otherwise have had to install shitty freeware like Avast or pay for premium antivirus solutions, basically paying to try to close loopholes that Microsoft made in the first place.

    • @AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      💯

      I almost opted to move my parents to use Linux instead of Windows because of how much time I was spending on fixing the malware and viruses they’d get. Then enter Windows Defender.

      Now all I have to deal with is when they get the occasional scam call… “Yes, it’s Bob from Microsoft, you need to wire us $900 to fix a virus.”

      • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        47 months ago

        Before Defender it was called Microsoft Security Essentials and was a standalone app.

        Worked damn good back then as well.

  • @cedeho@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    428 months ago

    Most Windows Programs running with root access is like, I don’t know… Windows XP era maybe?

  • @Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    297 months ago

    You laugh but windows defender is awesome. People give windows shit but the reason it’s attacked the most is because of it’s market share being above and beyond leaps and bounds sun vs tiny fleck of dust in space os market shares that Linux and Mac os have. No one’s wasting time hacking the tiny stuff as much just because its a numbers game. Guarenfuckingtee you if Linux was number one market share OS it would be getting attacked way more often than any other OS as well. Dont kid yourselves.

    • @RmDebArc_5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      macOS and Linux have additional security features at a system level, on Linux most software comes through controlled repositories or sandboxed flatpaks. There are also tons of multi million dollar companies that constantly try to find and fix kernel level vulnerabilities and a distro like Debian, which is very popular for servers, has had less major vulnerabilities than windows 7 throughout its entire lifecycle and Debian exists for other 30 years. So I’d say Linux is would have a few less (different) attacks

  • aard
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    Windows NT 3.5 and later NT 4 had C2 security certifications - assuming the system was not connected to a network, and didn’t have floppy drives (this was before USB was a thing).

    • @Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah it literally pops a screen sized warning when anything tries to run as admin. Linux is very vulnerable as well. Hackers are just really good at what they do.

  • katy ✨
    link
    57 months ago

    windows defender is better than how it used to be where had to buy an expensive proprietary av or download clam av and hope for the best

  • @Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    58 months ago

    Does Smartscreen upload your .exes ? I disable its internet access and would be stupid if it only uses that to download databases or stuff.

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    37 months ago

    The only secure Windows is Windows 1.0. There is no network stack in it, and nobody would want to use it anyway.

    Anything else is up for grabs.

    • katy ✨
      link
      27 months ago

      but i wanna play reversi