RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1414cross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
arrow-up1414external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: socialism@lemmy.mlglobalnews@lemmy.zipnews@beehaw.orgworld@lemmy.worldfinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.mlenvironment@beehaw.org
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoLess kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
minus-squareDizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoDepending on who you ask, yes.
Less kids means less money spent and more money saved in the long run, so yeah.
Removed by mod
Depending on who you ask, yes.