Ridley Scott has been typically dismissive of critics taking issue with his forthcoming movie Napoleon, particularly French ones.

While his big-screen epic, starring Joaquin Phoenix as the embattled French emperor with Vanessa Kirby as his wife Josephine, has earned the veteran director plaudits in the UK, French critics have been less gushing, with Le Figaro saying the film could have been called “Barbie and Ken under the Empire,” French GQ calling the film “deeply clumsy, unnatural and unintentionally clumsy” and Le Point magazine quoting biographer Patrice Gueniffey calling the film “very anti-French and pro-British.”

Asked by the BBC to respond, Scott replied with customary swagger:

“The French don’t even like themselves. The audience that I showed it to in Paris, they loved it.”

The film’s world premiere took place in the French capital this week.

Scott added he would say to historians questioning the accuracy of his storytelling:

“Were you there? Oh you weren’t there. Then how do you know?”

    • Deuces@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basically all we know about him is that his name is Maximus Decimus Meridius. Father to a murdered child, husband to a murdered wife, and he will have his vengeance; in this life or the next.

      • lobotomo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which brings to mind something one of my history teachers taught us about the implausibility of that movie. The main characters name is essentially “Most Tenth Middle”.

        Quite the heroic name.

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Maximus” and “Decimus” were both real Roman names, but they wouldn’t have been used in that order. It would have been Decimus Meridius Maximus. Or something else in the middle, since I can’t find at instances of Romans called Meridius

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean… sure, it’s not named after him, but Marcus Aurelius is in that movie. They still have a column in his memory in Rome today.

      On the minus side, he’s in the movie just for a little bit and you can’t really prove that he wasn’t murdered by Commodus in a fit of jealous rage. On the plus column, Napoleon is already one of the most misrepresented historical figures, so… call it a tie?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I realize I’m in a minority here, but I knew too much about Roman history to enjoy Gladiator. Which is odd, because I love I, Claudius and it’s complete nonsense too.