• 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we were missing whole continents, I don’t think we’d split the remaining supercontinent across the edges of the map and focus on the ocean lol

  • joneskind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    America is a continent, composed by North America and South America

    United States is a nation from North America

    What does this title even mean ? What if Columbus didn’t exist ? By the way, if you’d asked yourself why so many African countries spoke French, you wouldn’t have drawn your map this way.

    EDIT: Oh my, this is bad… Didn’t see that the left part of the map was the current East of Asia.

    I owe everyone an apology for my mistake. I will not delete my post as a reminder of my own stupidity.

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I know that Columbus didn’t discovered shit _

        My point was that OP’s title is not clear.

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t wanna delete, but wanna highlight your edit, then you could strike thru the text you would have deleted.

    • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You:

      America is a continent, composed by North America and South America

      The title:

      What if America didn’t exist?

      You can see that there is no America on the map, Columbus wound up in the Orient like he intended

      • joneskind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh boy… my bad

        I’m so used to see American continent on the left of a map that I thought it was it

        I’ll my post alive, as a reminder to my own stupidity.

    • spauldo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ll notice if you look that North America and South America are missing from the map. That’s what the title means.

      Also, there’s no consensus on how many continents there are. Someone from the US would be very surprised to hear that North and South America are the same continent.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the treaties of Tordesillas and Zaragoza happened in that alternate world, they would prevent such Oceania. Picture related:

    a world map dividing the world into two hemispheres, as per the treaties abovementioned

    I have no idea on where those lines would be set up. But they would almost certainly not allow a New Beira and a New Algarve in the same longitude as a New Spain, unless one of them for some reason decided to not settle in those lands, and the Iberian Union still happened, and the other was allowed to settle in. Based on the rather aggressive expansion of those two governments in the Americas, I think that this is hard to believe.

    The name of the Portuguese possessions would likely have something to do with religion or the local geography, instead of following a “New [insert place]” naming convention. More local placenames would be likely borrowed from the local languages, and then butchered into fitting Portuguese phonology.

    • DrQuint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Portugal and Spain would have never even started the treaty if they didn’t already suspect the existence of South America. Spain particularly would have absolutely not had it. If anything, it’s Africa that would look more like a splintered mess. So trying to go about the shape of the world by that standard is probably the wrong idea.

      • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They likely would - both treaties are predated by one from 1479, signed in Alcáçovas at the end of the War of Castilian Succession, that already split the Atlantic Ocean and overseas territories between both crowns. Back then the issue was Africa and the Canary Islands. As such, even if South America didn’t exist, both crowns would be bickering for control over something else. Perhaps New Guinea or Australia.

        What could change however is where the lines would be split, specially the one for the Treaty of Zaragoza. If ToT was at 82°W (New Zealand Catalonia in this map - roughly halfway between Hispaniola* and Cape Verde, like in the RL ToT), then ToZ would be probably 118°E, roughly at the Indus River. If anything the Portuguese crown would be the ones slightly pissed by this division, as it wanted control over India.

        EDIT: in other words I’m not convinced that we should automatically brush off ToT as not happening in that alternate world. Or that Africa would look like [ipsis digitis] a splintered mess.

        *present in this map, near Japan.

  • lugal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is this a real historical map? I’ve seen a map were cuba was Japan and Florida was Korea but having Japan and Cuba next to each other…

    Either way, I like it, it’s well done!

    Edit: I just read the name of the community, sorry for being stupid