Snapshot of Eurozone inflation falls to 5.5% in sharp contrast to UK. Economists put reason for divergence down to Brexit and Britain’s energy price guarantee.

  • G4Z@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I know what the difference is, I’ve just shown you that the OBR is referring to GDP when they walk about ‘long term productivity growth’ and nothing you have posted there contradicts that.

    Seems to be a pattern here, you say something incorrect, I point it out, and you throw insults.

    • emerty@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol, no they’re not. Productivity is not GDP…

      And the 4% is over 15 years and is a result of loss of comparative advantage.

      If you have to compound an effect over 15 years to get 4%, the effect is fuck all.

      • G4Z@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So why do Bloomberg put it at 100bn based on that 4% figure?

        If you have to compound an effect over 15 years to get 4%, the effect is fuck all.

        Yeah, sounds unlikely doesn’t it?

        Let me ask you, what do you think it’s cost the UK per year in billion pounds?

        • emerty@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, sounds unlikely doesn’t it?

          But that’s what the forecast says. 4% of productivity lost over the long term of 15 years due to loss of comparative advantage

          https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/the-economy-forecast/brexit-analysis

          But the forecast is for the cost, no benefit is included.

          The loss of comparative advantage is replaced, I’d argue, with competitive advantage which has a much stronger effect. The UK is no longer bound by the anti science regulations on genetic engineering and the new overly restrictive proposed regulations on AI

          GDP per capita is a ratio of GDP / population, so if you do more with fewer people, by using automation, robots and AI, your GDP per capita will grow…

          The 4% figure over 15 years is a difference of 0.29% to 0.27% productivity growth. Government policy has at least that 0.02% effect

          I predict a Starmer govt will be able to introduce policy that will offset the productivity loss just by investing in renewable energy, let alone any research universities’ innovations.