So I’ve recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I’ve looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for “apps”, but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven’t distro hopped yet, as I’m still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.


What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I’m mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?

  • tanjaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got Nix OS running on one of my computer

    That’s very interesting 👀
    Why did you choose NixOS?

    • Audacity9961@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Mostly to learn about it’s unique selling points.

      I think it is very interesting in terms of the easy deployment of specific environments, and in terms of writing recipes for new packages.

      Having said that, outside of these two rather niche areas for home use, I think it is rather unintuitive and offers no real advantages over more established players that offer a more polished experience, like Fedora for workstation and gaming use.