I know Debian and others can breathe life into older machines. But i wonder if there are any distros with serious optimizations that I haven’t heard of. I’ve already tried MX Linux on an old Thinkpad SL400, and didn’t see any difference from plain Debian.

Update: thanks for the great suggestions. Forgot to say many distros feel zippy and fast until you open a web browser. Appreciate your thoughts on which web browser to use too. So far I’ve had a positive experience with Thorium and Chromium.

  • llothar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with older machines is the web browsing, not the system itself. You could use a browser with Java script disabled but a lot of websites will refuse to work.

    You have to sacrifice with browser functionality to improve performance.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. All this optimization you see here about “minimal installs” and which DE to choose is completely moot, if opening Firefox takes up more RAM than the entire operating system.

      Even 4gb are really low these days, if you actually want to do something in the browser.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had good experiences with Midori and Dillo as alternative browsers on low-memory machines. Obviously features will take a hit but they’re surprisingly functional. Don’t expect to be able to open many tabs but you can do the usual things including YouTube etc.

  • ipsirc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Try: https://github.com/marmolak/gray386linux <– It was designed for really old hardwares.

    I’ve already tried MX Linux on an old Thinkpad SL400, and didn’t see any difference from plain Debian.

    Because it’s the stock Debian + custom themes/skins + some crappy useless minitools. The 99% of packages come from the official Debian repository, the rest are only the rice.

    If you have newer machine than a real 386:

  • WalrusByte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alpine is very lightweight. I think it was built so that it would run well inside docker containers, which means it should be fairly easy for low-end computers to run it.

    Afaik, it doesn’t come with a DE out of the box, so it won’t be very user-friendly

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    AntiX/MX Linux, I’ve had great success getting them to boot on systems that were refusing to boot anything else, AntiX is my go-to distro for bringing new life to old hardware, it works with literally anything you throw at it.

  • bbbhltz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it depends on what comes with the distro. If you start off with a basic Linux install and add a DE that is low on system resources, like LXQt, you can breathe life into a machine.

    Bodhi, antiX and Linux Lite come to mind.

    You can also start with a minimal base, Arch, Debian, Alpine, anything, and then add packages.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    c2d era laptop. first step if you haven’t yet, swap the hdd for a low-cost sata ssd if you can. if you have some homeless sodimms, up the ram, too, if it won’t cost anything to do it.

    if you’re going with mx, you want the fluxbox spin; or opt for antix with icewm instead.

    otherwise start with a debian base install (no de or extra sw at install), then add only what you need. peppermint is another option–a basic debian with xfce out-of-the-box and little else. it’s what i’ve been using lately on similar hardware.

    for something ‘different’, you could look at slax.

    • mFat@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. I’ve already added an ssd drive and upgraded tge ram from 3 to 4gb. Another comment mentioned Icewm so I’m definitely giving it a try.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In earlier Q4OS versions Trinity was the only desktop environment. I still run it even though there’s plenty of power on hand to run the others. It just works.

        • mFat@lemdro.idOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I always have a sweet spot for KDE 3.5. I remember how responsive and tast it was on my Pentium PC some 15 years ago.

          • spider@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Q4OS will release an updated version within a few weeks, so if you’re interested, keep an eye on the home page’s “Latest News”.

            (The developers are quite active in the forum, too.)

  • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you want serious optimizations - then Gentoo is your choice. But seriously, there won’t be any serious difference between distributions. What really matters here are DEs and browsers. I would recommend some kind of lightweight window manager like i3 or dwm. If you do not want to configure everything yourself, then your choice is lxde/lxqt. Also, you can use distros without systemd (void, artix, devuan, gentoo etc), but that does not matter that much.

    • meow
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another alternative to not configuring is using someone else’s rice

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So Slackware? If you can cross-compile then maybe gentoo. I’m not sure if Raspberry Pi Desktop is x86.

        • ipsirc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What makes it a bit faster specifically? I’ve been interested for a long time.

          • L3ft_F13ld!@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You install and it’s lightweight and already customised. If you like it, you’re done. Gets you started much faster than customising from scratch. If you mean performance, then it’s faster because they don’t come with a full desktop environment. They’re just using the Openbox window manager. Once you get used so it it’s perfectly usable.

            • ipsirc@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What makes it lightweight when it uses the same packages with the same dependencies? And what does prevent me from install openbox on Debian?

              • L3ft_F13ld!@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Like I said before, it gets you started faster than doing it yourself. If you don’t want to configure every little detail yourself then these are great options to get you going.

    • meow
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kinda surprising how much you can do in just a tty, the only thing I can’t think of a method for rn is viewing/editing documents.

    • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was really excited about peppermint so I switched my old laptop from Kubuntu. but peppermint feels more sluggish than KDE and now I’m not sure what I did wrong :(