Salamendacious@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agoChristian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ coupleswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square270fedilinkarrow-up1479file-textcross-posted to: religiouscringe@midwest.social
arrow-up1479external-linkChristian photographer wins right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ coupleswww.lgbtqnation.comSalamendacious@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square270fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: religiouscringe@midwest.social
minus-squareIapar@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up40·11 months agoDoes this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?
minus-squareRed_October@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 months agoIt would also likely mean that LGBTQ+ photographers won the right to discriminate against christians.
minus-squareUnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoI would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I’m glad we have the right to say no to that. That’s the whole point of this ruling. If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn’t have been allowed to say no.
minus-squareladyanita22@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoYes. For example, by not hiring him
minus-squareSoulg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoWell, they can, by just not choosing to hire one.
minus-squareUnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It’s perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who’s not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots. You get how this works now?
Does this in return mean that LGBTQ+ couples win the right to discriminate against christian photographers?
It would also likely mean that LGBTQ+ photographers won the right to discriminate against christians.
I would refuse to work at a Trumper wedding, so I’m glad we have the right to say no to that. That’s the whole point of this ruling.
If this was a photographer of color refusing to work a klan wedding no one would be arguing that they shouldn’t have been allowed to say no.
Yes. For example, by not hiring him
Well, they can, by just not choosing to hire one.
I think you might actually have just gotten the point here without knowing it. It’s perfectly reasonable to pick a photographer who’s not a bigot, just like how I would choose not to shoot photos for bigots.
You get how this works now?