• confluence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    From what I’ve seen, a lot of the motivation to not have peoples’ names attached to things is because people have things attached to them (such as racism). Not saying that’s every case, but I’m sure that’s a significant factor behind the general push.

      • confluence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Um. The names aren’t being replaced with other personal names, and even if they were, it’s certainly not with the names of the people doing the replacement.

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the point was they aren’t necessarily trying to replace names with their own, but they get the privilege to name it whatever they like and the name will be used until the next big wave of renaming things comes along.

          • confluence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still an odd accusation to me… How does that privilege say anything about ego, given that history probably won’t remember the renamers specifically?

            • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s really dependent on the attitude of the renamers. Maybe they are honored for the privilege and take it seriously, others might think it’s their god given right to name things and fuck the old names. That last one may be a bit extreme, and without actually knowing these people, the best option is to just not give a fuck and move on with life.