rockSlayer@lemmy.worldM to Leftism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agocrazy idea, let's just feed peoplelemmy.worldimagemessage-square342fedilinkarrow-up11.33K
arrow-up11.33Kimagecrazy idea, let's just feed peoplelemmy.worldrockSlayer@lemmy.worldM to Leftism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square342fedilink
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo. Sorry. Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats. Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies. Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property. Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoSharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior. As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species. You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIf dictionary terminology is unconventional then yes, we have descended into incoherence.
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoNo. You’re babbling. You traveled from worker exploitation to amoebas.
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoYour incapacity to follow a demonstrative metaphore is not an issue of my capacity.
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou are obstructing the workers’ struggle with dishonest obfuscation.
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoYou believe that because your understanding of my position is incomplete and you have chosen this as the point to switch from comprehension to belligerence.
minus-squareunfreeradical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI feel the structure of my engagement was balanced and measured, as you moved from irregular terminology to outright hokem. What do you wish to achieve, by asserting that private property is ineradicable and also observed in rats? Who else shares such beliefs or perspective?
No. Sorry.
Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats.
Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies.
Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property.
Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.
Re-read my edited comment.
Sharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior.
As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species.
You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.
If dictionary terminology is unconventional then yes, we have descended into incoherence.
No.
You’re babbling.
You traveled from worker exploitation to amoebas.
Your incapacity to follow a demonstrative metaphore is not an issue of my capacity.
You are obstructing the workers’ struggle with dishonest obfuscation.
You believe that because your understanding of my position is incomplete and you have chosen this as the point to switch from comprehension to belligerence.
I feel the structure of my engagement was balanced and measured, as you moved from irregular terminology to outright hokem.
What do you wish to achieve, by asserting that private property is ineradicable and also observed in rats?
Who else shares such beliefs or perspective?