The Chrome team says they’re not going to pursue Web Integrity but…

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team “heard your feedback.” I’m sure that’s true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the problem. They could have made it a requirement for a site to work in Chrome. And since Chrome has such a majority sites would have to comply. Then the other browsers would have to fall in line or just stop working with most websites. Google’s monopoly is complete enough that they can dictate how the web works. You need to both care what chrome does and care that other people are still using it or you’re just as fucked as they are.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please, people, stop using Chromium-based browsers and handing Google a near-monopoly. Firefox is awesome and has even more privacy-oriented derivates.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bope. I’ll continue using Brave, as it’s the best browser out there for my use case. Thank you for you concern. Firefox plainly sucks, thanks to Mozilla, and I tell this after having been a FF user, supporter and advocate for almost 20 years.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            What sucks so much in FF?

            Yes, performance used to be spotty but this is no longer the case.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              UI/UX/Performance/Mobile app/Slow on Linux/Mozilla (the latter is the worst)

              I’m not open to further debate. You asked, I replied. I preferred to migrate to a different browser and never look back, thanks to Mozilla.

                • Engywuck@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, sure /s.

                  Fuck Mozilla, really. I wouldn’t go back to FF even if it was the last browser on earth, as long as it gives oxygen to Mozilla. I’d like Moz Corp. to disappear.

                  • gentooer@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If Mozilla were to disappear, Chromium web engine would have a true monopoly. Seeing how bad things are getting with their almost monopoly, I’d like to help avoid that.

              • gentooer@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve been using FF (and Thunderbird) for about 5 years now on my dual core old laptop running Gentoo, and it’s always run pretty smooth. Especially when they switched to the Quantum web engine.

                  • gentooer@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not arguing that people are switching to Firefox. I’m only saying that your argument about FF on Linux is just plain wrong.

                    I also prefer the UI/UX of FF over Chromium based browsers, but that’s very subjective of course.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the current management is so horny to have Chrome be the next Internet Explorer like that. So sad Google has fallen so far.

      • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure on stats or anything, I know Google has paid a lot of money to get Chrome as a default browser, but I remember a time when it became ubiquitous because the family nerd would tell their parents to use it and so on. It could possibly happen again and have a lot of people switch to firefox because their favourite site stopped working on Chrome. It’s the kind of plan that could backfire pretty bad. There’s a lot of legal reasons for their hesitance I’m sure, but I think that sort of thing would also play into it. A bunch of parents calling up their children because something stopped working and being told to download firefox isn’t outside the scope of reality I don’t think.