spaceghoti@lemmy.one to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1617cross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1617external-linkPeople who work from home all the time ‘cut emissions by 54%’ against those in officewww.theguardian.comspaceghoti@lemmy.one to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.world
minus-squareSuperDuper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-21 year agoLet’s be honest here, it’s managers who are forcing employees to commute into the office for no reason that are raising emissions.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThe evidence is that, on average, people who spend time in the office are more productive. While I’m 100% on board for flexible work schedules that include time at home, it’s not “no reason” that they want people back in the office.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNah I just follow the evidence rather than what I want to be true
minus-squareidk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoHoly shit, 17 days here and you’ve done nothing but shill.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoEmpty ad hominem, but I guess it your position isn’t based in reality, I should expect your defense of it to be based in reality either.
Let’s be honest here, it’s managers who are forcing employees to commute into the office for no reason that are raising emissions.
The evidence is that, on average, people who spend time in the office are more productive. While I’m 100% on board for flexible work schedules that include time at home, it’s not “no reason” that they want people back in the office.
You are kidding, right?
Nah I just follow the evidence rather than what I want to be true
Holy shit, 17 days here and you’ve done nothing but shill.
Empty ad hominem, but I guess it your position isn’t based in reality, I should expect your defense of it to be based in reality either.