Voting rights groups decry error days before elections that will determine which party controls the state legislature

  • Null User Object@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would agree, with maybe two narrow exceptions. 1) Participation in a coup or insurrection against the federal or any state government, and 2) any action with intent to fraudulently deny any other person’s right to vote or have their vote counted.

    Would usually be hard to prove intent on the second one, but just the threat of it would probably stop a good bit of this nonsense. If you’re trying to block others from having their fair say in our democracy, then you shouldn’t have a say yourself, anymore.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      While that sounds good in that specific context, there are two considerations.

      If the number of people convicted is small, it only serves to set a precident for removing the right that could be applied to other criteria while not really having any impact on the voting results.

      Having something like that allows for it to be weaponized against political opponents and their supporters. We can already see that with removing felons right to vote, which goes along with discriminatory convictions intentionally designed to negatively impact minorities.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Revoke their citizenship. Drop them down to documented aliens. Let them earn their citizenship back the same way immigrants do, after a probationary period, of course. And in addition to prison time.

      Can imprisoned persons legally naturalize anyway? Normally they would just get deported.