“Officials said that Israel and Egypt were prepared to let foreigners leave the Strip which is under heavy Israeli bombardment, but Hamas had refused.”

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder what percentage of their rapidly diminishing military might is being used to block foreigners from leaving? seems like a poor allocation of resources… unless there’s something they dont want the foreigners to tell the outside world?

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not like they ever had a chance of winning considering their definition of winning is driving the Jews into the sea. Their whole purpose is to fuck shit up and cause maximum damage and this makes sense in that context.

      • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’s their endgame? how does that work when they’re surrounded on all sides (counting the sea)?

        • Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then think again. They literally say what their goal is - a forceful end to Israel. And that nothing less will be enough - and that they’ll keep killing civilians until that goal is met.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel will strike an area and kill hundreds of people. If there are males 16-30 killed they will say they were militants often, and that the civilians were collateral damage due to the use of proximity shielding. They do not go in and verify whether or not the people killed were militants. This is an age old tactic, the US would do the same to shift blame for atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      • Kashbus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        not incorrect, but it’s a common tactic used in Asymmetrical Warfare that is seen in the Levant when one side dwarf the other in conventional military size and strength

        is it honorable? no, but it one of the few tactics hamas has in operating against Israel

    • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas doesn’t need to do anything. All they have to do is say nobody’s getting out, which means the IDF can assume anyone running towards the exit is a terrorist making an attack. I think any foreign nationals that would ever travel to Gaza know better than to approach Israeli forces for help.

      If there’s anyone that doesn’t want the outside world to know what’s up, ask the folks who recently cut off internet access to Gaza. Who was it? It wasn’t Hamas.

      • Guydht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you seriously think Israel shut off internet to hide what’s inside? Do you know satellites exist? Do you know cameras exist? How in the world was that preventing anyone from seeing into Gaza?

          • Guydht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Try to think as an army for just a second. When you send your troops into unknown territory which is 100% trapped, you wanna confuse your enemy. And shutting communication is exactly that.

            It absolutely fails at hiding what’s going on in Gaza from being revealed, but it *50% succeeds in making their enemies blind during their attack. It’s just a military tactic. A proven and effective one.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      None. This is the Telegraph a known israeli propaganda outlet. Israel is literally bombing the border crossing and this newspaper is telling you that Hamas is the one responsible for it.