Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Because people can't seem to visualize itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11.37Kcross-posted to: moinsdevoitures@jlai.lu
arrow-up11.37KimageBecause people can't seem to visualize itlemmy.worldPotatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square108fedilinkcross-posted to: moinsdevoitures@jlai.lu
minus-squarebioemerl@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 年前Cars also have people in them, which images like this conveniently forget.
minus-squareLuxlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·1 年前People also have cars in them, which comments like this conveniently forget.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 年前have you seen that ad showing people simulating traffic but without the cars? it’s just even more poignant as it shows how absurdly inefficient cars are at transporting people (on average a car contains 1.2 people).
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前this isn’t even as hilariously obvious as that ad is, i searched it up because look at this shit lmao https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_oWmY_mkCA
Cars also have people in them, which images like this conveniently forget.
🚘🧠 spotted
People also have cars in them, which comments like this conveniently forget.
have you seen that ad showing people simulating traffic but without the cars? it’s just even more poignant as it shows how absurdly inefficient cars are at transporting people (on average a car contains 1.2 people).
this isn’t even as hilariously obvious as that ad is, i searched it up because look at this shit lmao
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_oWmY_mkCA