• TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      They set fire to babies. They already let the “Go Max Barbarian” toothpaste out of the tube. There’s no putting that shit back.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, fuck both sides. Indiscriminate killing is indiscriminate killing. Hamas is bad but carpet bombing hospitals isn’t better.

            • BassTurd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Admittedly I just realized I misread the initial post I responded to. I thought it said, you can’t be pro-palistine without being pro-hamas. None the less, nobody’s have are clean in this conflict.

              • Zorque@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d say the children killed by both Israeli bombings and Hamas rockets are probably pretty fuckin’ clean.

                • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Right, which is why I think both sides suck. The gray is that there is a lot more history then the last couple of weeks. None of it justifies current actions, but it’s not black and white…

      • SYLOH@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        A stance of “Both sides are bad” is just a stance that favors the Status Quo.
        The underdog needs the extra assistance, the superior doesn’t.
        So for that reason I’m pro-Israel, don’t want either side winning, don’t want aid to either side, so that defaults to a pro-Israel stance.
        I’m comfortable being labeled as such.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get it. It’s a dirty situation with tons of gray area. I think Israel has the edge in higher ground, but every new article that comes out of their atrocities erodes away that high ground.

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry what high ground has Israel. Over the years they proved how morally corrupt they are. And the civilian casualties are way higher on the Palestinian side.

            Checking the historical number of kids and women who succumbed on both sides is showing a terrifying trend.

            This recent escalation just proves once again how bad they are.

      • TheBlue22
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like anti Israel (government and civilians) and anti Hamas (hamas and civilians) ?

          • Vqhm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rule 28. Medical units exclusively assigned to medical purposes must be respected and protected in all circumstances. They lose their protection if they are being used, outside their humanitarian function, to commit acts harmful to the enemy.

            https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule28#:~:text=to medical units-,Rule 28.,and protected in all circumstances.

            the protection of medical units ceases when they are being used, outside their humanitarian function, to commit acts harmful to the enemy. This exception is provided for in the First and Fourth Geneva Conventions and in both Additional Protocols.[37] It is contained in numerous military manuals and military orders.[38] It is also supported by other practice.[39]

            While the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols do not define “acts harmful to the enemy”, they do indicate several types of acts which do not constitute “acts harmful to the enemy”, for example, when the personnel of the unit is armed, when the unit is guarded, when small arms and ammunition taken from the wounded and sick are found in the unit and when wounded and sick combatants or civilians are inside the unit.[40] According to the Commentary on the First Geneva Convention, examples of acts harmful to the enemy include the use of medical units to shelter able-bodied combatants, to store arms or munitions, as a military observation post or as a shield for military action.[41]

              • Vqhm@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Unfortunately based on the rules of was the medical staff do not have to cooperate, or even be aware, simply storing weapons, or a command center, or staging armed soldiers for war next to a hospital removes the protections.

                The rules of war aren’t about making things perfect, they’re very much a do not let perfect be the enemy of good and filled with compromises.

                If you want protections for medical staff you have to clear a section of ground for them that isn’t used for war.

                I didn’t make these rules. These rules were agreed to in order to try to prevent total war. Where carpet bombs flattened entire cities like what happened in Dresden.