Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Google paid a whopping $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine everywherewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1548 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1548external-linkGoogle paid a whopping $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine everywherewww.theverge.comTimely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square74fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarehagelslager@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-21 年前And DuckDuckGo lacks basic stuff such as keyword exclusion. (It’s my main search engine for the last few years after Startpage got bought, but lacking keyword exclusion sucks!)
minus-squareClay_pidgin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前you can -something , but it isn’t full exclusion. It’s generally been good enough for me. I agree the full fat version would be nice.
minus-squarehagelslager@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前So far I haven’t had any luck with -something “soft” exclusions either.
minus-squarerikonium@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Yea I bailed after they nerfed exclusions and whatnot but not like the others are slam dunks
And DuckDuckGo lacks basic stuff such as keyword exclusion. (It’s my main search engine for the last few years after Startpage got bought, but lacking keyword exclusion sucks!)
you can -something , but it isn’t full exclusion. It’s generally been good enough for me. I agree the full fat version would be nice.
So far I haven’t had any luck with -something “soft” exclusions either.
Yea I bailed after they nerfed exclusions and whatnot but not like the others are slam dunks