Headlines have never made me watch ads or accept cookies

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wow… this is something that users on The Site That Shall Not Be Named were especially hostile about. Even if you made an irrelevant spelling mistake, it was like people couldn’t wait to be first to tell you to “read the fucking article.”

    Actually, a lot of them didn’t even care about being first. Have eight people already commented “read the article”? So what? Might as well say the exact same thing a ninth time!

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why read the article when the journalist just uses the headline for their ChatGPT prompt?

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Aside from clickbait headlines subconsciously making opening links even more sus than it already is, they all just want you to go to the actual article so they can track at the very least their pagevisits for personal validation, leaving you either with misunderstandable headlines or “…and this is what happened next…”-cliffhangers.

    Anyway, crossposting an article on many mediums - instead of making it on one external site and posting the link to other mediums - usually solves the problem. I’ll be more likely to read the entirety of anything òn the website I’m at than I am to follow external links to the unknown website people “thought was safe enough”. 😅