• nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    anyone who buys an SUV is a stupid fucker. there are other types of cars that have just as much unnecessary seat space in them. if you bought an SUV I’m talking directly to you and I’m calling you an idiot to your face. on the internet.

    • mob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      My Ford Taurus isn’t going to get into the Uintas or Wasatch range. Getting rid of my SUV will really hurt my wifes ability to release rehabilitated animals.

      But, I don’t want to be a stupid fucker. What should I get after I get rid of my SUV?

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        Subaru hatchbacks are great off road and have about the same capacity as most SUVs.

        • ur_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          100% agree. I’m a handyman and drive an outback. People are usually surprised when I open the hatch and it’s full of my tool boxes.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Pretty low clearance but maybe we can get some beavers in there.

          I was being snarky originally but you could have a point there.

          • gulasch_hanuta@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            You are literally the only reason they should exist. One does not need such a car in suburbs or cities.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              Just require a commercial license/insurance for vehicles that large (and up)

              You’ll have a lot less people who don’t need them

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The older (until 2003 ish) Impreza can hold a whole ass washer/dryer/oven/dishwasher in the back no issue then they made it too round. I remember helping someone move and they had a stupid “truck” but could not get the bed cover off so me and my snoopy looking car moved all the appliances (3 trips) while the “truck” moved boxes and flat furniture.

            Edit to add:

            If you want to have a better chance at offroad with a subaru invest in a good skidplate and if really needed they have a higher clearance model. I have been places in them that the brodozers get stuck in seconds.

      • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Even an older model SUV like a Honda CRV will take up a lot less space than its modern counterpart. Station wagons can be sexy too if that’s your style.

        • GreenM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Don’t let me start about my station wagon. I can get them back seats perfectly horizontal connecting the back space with middle and it makes comfy double bed. Not to mention that under the floor there are tons of storage spaces to keep all the tools and food or whatever out of the way.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Emissions make sense to me, but does conserving space actually matter?

          • cosmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            In cities it does. Here where I live there’s being made a point of existing parking spaces being too narrow for modern cars. They are so much wider these days.

      • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        While parent is extreme and minimizes that some people have legitimate needs… You do raise another interesting point… You have an SUV and a Fullsize Sedan. I’m sure you have your reasons but it’s an amusing anecdote.

        • mob@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          yeah. turns out animal rehibition isn’t very profitable and I wasn’t really expecting to end up in a responsible/respectable life. We bought what we could afford.

          I take my electric skateboard to school when I can(weather permitting) , but I will choose shitty emissions for a 10-50 mile drive to save an animals life over letting it die or live in a cage. and honestly, I am only going to school to get money to expand the rehabilitation… I will try to get a vehicle that is better for the environment when I can afford it though.

      • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        A station wagon is easier for moving animals, more space than a small SUV - it’s lower to the ground (huge plus if you have to lift them in, easier for them if you are leading them up a portable ramp).

        The trade off is you can’t do soft sand, cross deeper streams etc, but IMO animals don’t need to be released far off track, to me it’s worth the trade off.

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        People driving heavy terrain in wilderness around here use small jeep like cars. Even US army used use them back in the day before monster trucks became a thing.
        Edit: I meant small variants. Not the big size ones.

          • GreenM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            But it’s not huge ass truck like vehicle. One is parked right next to mu European sized car and Jeep’s smaller overall even if bit higher due to being offroad vehicle.

            Edit: I mean small jeeps. Not their big variants.

            I think point of critique of modern SUV usage is about their unnecessary big size and weight which leads to space wasting and higher fuel consumption which has its own negatives.

            • mob@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t think I agree. Pretty sure a 2 door jeep is still a sport utility vehicle

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I am not a jeep fan but I don’t think I can put a 2 door YJ in the same category as say an escalade. We need to make trains and smaller cars cool again.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re the asshole here. There’s SUVs and crossovers (aka short SUVs), almost zero sedans are manufactured these days thanks to the dumb ass govt and cafe. I don’t even want nor have**** an SUV, but judging people for having something you don’t want is ignorant and foolish. People pick from what is available for the most part. Giant cheap ass SUVs are easier to find than a small sedan that gets 4 mpg better mileage and that’s the govt’s fault.

      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        it has nothing to do with personal preference. that is your own selfish rhetorical frame. those things are wasteful and dangerous and require shitty hostile infrastructure. they are also a huge scam and you don’t need one. this is why Americans are depressed as fuck.

        • IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have a 7 seat tandem bicycle and tow a wagon on my grocery trips. Don’t mind the fact that the nearest Walmart is a 14 mile trip since I can’t take the highway on my 7 seat bicycle, that’s not relevant. I just have to keep in mind that as my toddlers grow their pedals and seats need to be adjusted, but at least they should have more power to drive us up 15° grades as they grow. Thank goodness we will never have to leave our home in any case of emergency because our nearest hospital is only 10 miles away, well, make that 20 miles since we can’t use the highway. At least we have the consolation of only getting 8’ of snow each winter. Could be worse. Just gotta get my 4 year old to use his weight for traction. So long as we have public transport we should be just fine. All I have to do now is lobby my government for the infrastructure to create public transport. That should be easy. I mean it’s one infrastructure, what could it cost? $10?

      • bad_alloc@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 months ago

        They are a lot more efficient in their class and might convince some ICE drivers to switch. Their range tends to be quite good. Unfortunately they have drawbacks:

        • They require a very large battery. If you don’t find >150kW chargers, you’ll be waiting a long time
        • More batteries per car = worse environmental impact from production
        • Road degradation grows by the fourth power w.r.t. vehicle weight. The big batteries make electric SUVs very heavy
        • SUVs are more dangerous for pedestrians due to their size
        • In a crash SUVs deliver much more energy, killing more people.
      • nutsack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        it’s a fucking stupid piece of shit for the same reason the other ones are pieces of shit. you think electricity is magic or something? like it comes free out of God’s asshole? your car sucks ass you fell for a scam

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have an SUV thst weighs 2,000 pounds and has a 1.3 liter engine, it seats two, you need to stop being a dumbass and sell your gas guzzling car because it absolutely has more wasted seats and a larger engine.

      • David_Eight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Kinda yeah, why not buy a hatchback instead? The Suzuki being taller will inherently have more wind resistance, hence worse gas milage and Co2. Unless you absolutely need the extra ground clearance, which very very few do, it’s stupid.

        • WereCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It is taller but it’s overall still a small car and also very light. It also uses battery to help with acceleration a bit (mild hybrid). I don’t think just because it’s taller it automatically makes it worse. There must be other factors to consider too.

          And the reason I personally don’t like hatchbacks is because I’m quite tall and I don’t like sitting low as it feels uncomfortable to me and makes getting in and out of a car pain in the ass… especially when parking near other cars with little space to open the door.

          • David_Eight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t think just because it’s taller it automatically makes it worse.

            It makes it get less mpg/range. Also Less “safe” as the higher center of gravity will mean taking emergency maneuvers “swerving to avoid collision” more difficult and the chance of rollover more likely. These are just facts.

            And the reason I personally don’t like hatchbacks is because I’m quite tall and I don’t like sitting low as it feels uncomfortable to me and makes getting in and out of a car pain in the ass…

            I’m 6’5 and understand where you’re coming from but, your comfort is basically bad for the environment in a small minute way is my point. I’m sure it’s still more efficient then 99% of cars in general by the sound of it though.