Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond — a Republican — is bucking his own party in a new lawsuit aimed at preventing what would be the first publicly funded religious school in America from opening.

On Friday, Drummond filed the suit in Oklahoma Supreme Court, challenging the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board’s 3-2 decision in June to grant a contract to open St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual Charter School. According to PBS, Drummond warned that the establishment of St. Isidore, which is sponsored by the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, would lead to the floodgates opening for religious groups of all stripes to make bids for public funding for schools of their own.

“Make no mistake, if the Catholic Church were permitted to have a public virtual charter school, a reckoning will follow in which this state will be faced with the unprecedented quandary of processing requests to directly fund all petitioning sectarian groups,” the lawsuit read.

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not walking is also default when youre born, guess what, life happens, it changes you

      • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you were to hit a reset button on the world and every human started over with no memory, they would definitely be walking, but there would not be identical organized religions. This is because walking is natural and religion is a creation of man’s imagination.

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why do they have to be identical? Religion would happen like it already has, that was my point

          • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I said identical because if there was an inherent truth to any one religion then it would be replicated. It’s true that other religions would inevitably pop up, but that doesn’t mean they would have any credibility, they would just be random new god(s).

      • Promethiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your deity of choice (It honestly doesn’t matter which religion you subscribe to) saw fit to include the ability for walking, built in.

        A feral child wouldn’t lack for the ability to move, they just need to survive that long.

        This C©reator(s) must have been too shy/wise/unknowable to also include the knowledge of their magnificence without another person telling you what to believe however.

        If this is what you truly believe, fine. But “life happens” with or without belief in a God.

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes it can happen, like I said life changes you, so mentioning default state means nothing

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you dont grow up and grow away from imaginary religious nonsense, you are still crawling around on the ground.

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dehumanizing fantasies that make you feel better is exactly the sort of imaginary religious nonsense that you need to evolve your thought processes away from, pal.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a parent of 3 I very strongly disagree with this.

      Kids are superstitious as fuck. Man’s natural state is believing in the supernatural because of how our brains work to piece together information.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The supernatural, yes. Someone else’s rigidly defined and extremely authoritarian guilt-based explanation of the supernatural though? Nothing natural about that.

        It’s NOT natural for a child, being naturally curious and expressive, to be told “this is the only truth and if you don’t agree then that makes you a bad person who’s going to suffer for eternity”

      • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right that it is human psychology but Supernatural / God is an easy explanation for things we don’t understand because it doesn’t actually explain why things happen, it is a scapegoat that avoids answering the question. In the absence of information, it is more comfortable to feel like we have an understanding of something rather than admit we don’t know why it happens , so we are inclined to believe the leading theory even if it doesn’t have supporting evidence.

        As we grow and learn about the knowledge modern humans have gathered, we understand why things actually happen. For example, humans used to think a sun god pulled the sun across the sky, then we learned about the solar system. As the breadth of scientific knowledge grows, the areas for supernatural/religious claims shrink.