Sarah Katz, 21, had a heart condition and was not aware of the drink’s caffeine content, which exceeded that of cans of Red Bull and Monster energy drinks combined, according to a legal filing

  • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not going to lie when I first read the headline I thought this was probably a frivolous lawsuit but after reading the article I thought that stuff should get pulled.

    • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      144
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like that McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit. Poor lady was made a mockery of for ordering hot coffee because it sounds ridiculous at first but she had 2nd degree burns. It was recklessly hot, as was this drink recklessly produced and marketed.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        122
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        3rd degree groin burns that required grafts.

        She initially asked for just 20k to cover her medical bills, and they instead offered like $800.

        Also of note, that huge 2.7mil fine the jury found? Just the profits from 2 days of McDonald’s coffee sales. The judge reduced it to $650k, but even that likely wasent paid as they settled out of court at that point.

        • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          67
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was also discovered that McDonald’s was aware of the danger of serving their coffee that hot, yet they continued to do so because it meant they had to give fewer free refills. If you have to wait 20 minutes for your coffee to cool down before you drink it, you’re going to get less refills overall

          • Misconduct@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            The worst part of that is knowing they probably determined it’s cheaper to settle injuries than keep it at the temps they were supposed to. I know corporations are soulless money making machines but that always feels extra dark to think about

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              corporations are soulless money making machines

              The worst part: Corporations are run by people, people hired to do a job, people who can say “fuck no, I’m not doing this evil thing for a couple bucks of a raise”… but eventually some people get hired who will do that evil thing, even with no raise.

              Remember Google’s “don’t be evil”? Eventually they hired enough people who don’t care, that they could remove the slogan.

          • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            IIRC their explanation was for take away, keeping the coffee hotter so it would last until you got home.

          • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I thought the specific wording in their documentation was because they wanted the smell of the coffee to fill the restaurant. Did McDonald’s give refills of coffee?

      • Hillock@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        The McDonald’s lady’s case blew up because the jury slapped McDonald’s with huge punitive damages. If she would have gotten the 10-30k she asked for initially or even just the 125k for actual damages no one would care about the case. But the 2.7 million in punitive damages just make this lawsuit seem frivolous. But she had no control over that.

        And IIRC one big reason why she won was because the cups weren’t suited for holding such hot liquid. The temperature of coffee didn’t decrease in McDonald’s after the lawsuit.

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There were several factors at once. Serving to a customer at 180+ is a bit high. And that particular machine was slightly overcalibrated. It was 193 degrees if I recall, not 180-190. And then, yeah, the cups are crap.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t fully appreciate our mouth’s tolerance to temperature until I was lazy the other day and used my finger to stir some tea instead of going back to the kitchen and getting a spoon.

            Blazing hot for a finger, nice and refreshing for a drink

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gonna suggest it’s less simple than that. The mouth only touches a small amount of fluid at once. The temperature plummets really quickly when you sip the hot coffee.

              When you stick a finger in the coffee, there’s a lot more coffee keeping the liquid contacting your finger hot. That’s why you sip hot coffee. If you do a quick dip with your finger, it won’t burn.

              It’s similar to how you can accidentally brush a hot pan and not get a burn.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny you should mention that. I use to work for the franchise owner who’s brother-in-law (who also worked for the franchise) gave that woman the cup of coffee (or so he would say) when they were franchising with McDonalds. And guess where I was working at the time? Panera

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do a bit of research into the marketing actually used for this drink. Assuming the store uses the standard Panera marketing, there’s a big sign on the dispenser saying how much caffeine is in it. It’s a tragic mistake, but unless that location uniquely screwed up, that’s all it is.

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Another commentor said their husband ordered it thinking it was a regular lemonade. The issue could be more wide spread than a single store.

        • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I noted that. Yet another commentor linked to a vlog where the signs weren’t present because the dispensers were behind the counter and had to be ordered. I think there are absolutely locations NOT showing the marketing.

          But please check out the other comments here and see the one showing what the dispensers with signs look like. Those are BIG signs with BIG mention of caffeine.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they’re legally liable after what I’ve read through and personally experienced – but I absolutely don’t think this is a frivolous lawsuit. It’s still worth merit when it comes to signage and frankly medical testing.

      The biggest problem is that she drank it without knowing the heart condition. We need to have better detection and screening to make sure people know this.