• EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      More than to protect a real password, this is done (in my experience) to prevent a bunch of unoriginal drones make that THEIR password, because they think is funny, which only means the string gets added to a “passwords to attempt” text list on some hacking website …

      Decreasing security all together

      Case in point: Hunter2, correcthorsebatterystaple, solarwinds123 and Pa$$w0rd1

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the philosophy behind correcthorsebatterystaple is good. I used that method for master passwords to password managers and it really does work well to help you remember a long complex password that can’t be guessed easily.

        But some people might have been missing the point of that xkcd using correcthorsebatterystaple itself.

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s okay. The thing is when running an attack are you going to permutate through every combination of characters, or are you going to use words from a dictionary first? correcthorsebatterystaple (not a dictionary word) is better than antidisestablishmentarianism (a dictionary word) but in a realistic attack concatenating dictionary words is going to be the next step.

          • Terrasque@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because of the number of potential words in the dictionary, it’s still fairly secure. I would recommend 5 or 6 words though