• SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think BAC is probably the best real indicator we have, the issue that stands out to me about it is (unsure if state or national) the legal limit has been lowered twice in my memory, and it was due to groups like MAAD pushing, not scientific studies.

    Note: MAAD was just an example I chose, I really know nothing about them. They could be complete abolishonists or concerned citizens, I have no opinion.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion, I have no problem lowering the BAC floor. You cannot tell when you’re too drunk to drive. It’s much safer to just follow the maxim of if you’re going to drink, don’t drive; if you’re going to drive, don’t drink. It’s so easy to not drink alcohol. Easier than drinking even; you just have to not buy it.

      My opinion might be skewed because I know several alcoholics who insist that they’re good (if not “better”) drivers when they’re buzzed. I hate my city’s drug culture. People treat me like a damn unicorn because I don’t use alcohol, nicotine, or THC.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easier than drinking even; you just have to not buy it.

        I don’t buy more than 1 beer when I go out. I end up drinking 4-5 because people buy me drinks for singing. I literally sing for my supper liquid bread.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just FYI it stands for Mothers Against Drunk Driving. They are MADD not MAAD. I remember the church bus accident on I-71 in Kentucky. That’s when they got a ton of political capital.