• @BaronVonBort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1089 months ago

    Bibi not using available intelligence to avoid the attack?

    I don’t understand, why would he want that! What would he have to gain?

    (Obvious sarcasm)

  • @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    909 months ago

    9-11 was a failure of intelligence. It also led to easy justification for two wars. But I’m sure this won’t be like that. People will be reasonable this time. /s

    • @crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      299 months ago

      The news-media has been calling it “Israel’s 9-11” pretty much from Day 1. Kind of thought it was understood Bibi let this happen for genocide justification purposes.

      • @Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Kind of thought it was understood Bibi let this happen

        he’s a dumb corrupt piece of shit, but this is something that needs evidence if you’re gonna imply it’s some sort of obvious open secret. We did that for that war monger Bush, we can do it to bibi instead of just assuming and passing it off as fact

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          The question is what’s stronger, Bibi’s moral fibre or his desire to stay in power and avoid prison? Because I am not that quite sure about the non-genocidality of characters like Ben-Gvir.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    659 months ago

    You mean the guy who pushed to empower Hamas in order to weaken the PLO might be a little responsible for this?

      • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        FR, he actually made himself immune to any legal accountability and nobody realized until his corruption trials a few years ago. Israelites looking like the dumbest mfs on the planet right now.

    • peopleproblems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Mostly because Netanyahoo is still better at porn than Netangoogle. I don’t remember how it compares to Netanbing.

      I personally prefer Netanduckduckgo.

    • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The massive anti-Netanyahu protests and reorganization of government as a result of his corruption trials are actually part of the reason that they failed to defend against the initial rocket attack. Hamas made a statement that they weren’t expecting all of their forces to get through, so they crossed in groups from multiple directions and attacked multiple barriers and comm towers, but literally all of them made it. They called the IDF a paper tiger.

      EDIT: To Be Clear, I’m not saying that they shouldn’t have protested and reorganized, I am instead saying they should have removed him maybe even killed him. The people of Israel failed to prevent this by allowing Corruption to continue.

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    559 months ago

    Now, do they think he failed by instituting inhumane conditions on Gaza leading to them lashing out? Or he failed by not oppressing them enough?

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      369 months ago

      Or failed by diverting almost all the border guards over to the West Bank to oppress the Palestinians there.

      But we need to how they feel about that second part…

      The official policy on Hamas was to just sort of ignore them in favor of stealing land in the West Bank.

    • HuddaBudda
      link
      fedilink
      139 months ago

      I don’t think people in Israel view it as a good or bad way, just by the results.

      If someone tries to sell you on less freedom, less privacy, more surveillance, and you still get attacked, then people start to wonder what was the point. Regardless of the measures taken.

  • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    509 months ago

    This is almost the exact same article that was posted last week, except this time from Reuters instead of JPost. They both reference polls done by Maariv, but once again fail to link to actual poll results. Am I taking crazy pills here for wanting to see the actual poll? Wtf is up with modern journalism?

    • @Marcumas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      269 months ago

      Nobody wants to pay for news; which means nobody gets paid well to report it. So here we are in this dumpster fire of modern journalism.

      • ShroOmeric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        More like people stopped paying for the news because it became a dumpster fire. You got confused there my friend.

        • @OniiFam
          link
          English
          9
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Removed by mod

          • ShroOmeric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            Same old story: you give people no choice and when they make the only choice you left them you use that to justify your actions.

      • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        It’s also held to literally no standards whatsoever, so unlike scientific journals they don’t need to show all of the source data or list references.

      • ShroOmeric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Yeah, they’re putting a lot of old conspirancies under a brand new light. Too much control on the news environment.

    • @AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It took Joe Biden to travel to Israel to Scooby Doo the Middle East and tell us who the real perpetrator of the conflict is.

    • @nbafantest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      Honestly, no news sites actually like the poll unless they’re the ones that do it. (Youll sometimes see Fox link to a fox poll for example)

      I dont know why this is. Maybe they don’t want you to leave their site?

      • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        I don’t find that to be the case. I always make it a point to check the actual polls instead of relying on the headlines, and it’s usually pretty easy to find. For some reason, this particular poll has been reported multiple times in the last week and I’ve never been able to find a link to it. Last week someone even looked at the Israeli website of the people conducting the poll and still couldn’t find it.

  • @Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    439 months ago

    I mean yeah, he’s a corrupt piece of trash who is actively hurting israelis (and basically everyone else in the region for that matter)

    • @pureness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      Reigon? World man, these wars have ripple effects that totally skew some people into full blown racists. Hell, that poor kid got shot by his landlord recently.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I’m pretty sure that’s who they’re talking about. They just thought they got shot instead. Someone correct me if two kids got murdered by their landlords recently…

  • @Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    279 months ago

    “Failing” implies that it was unintentional.

    The evidence quite clearly indicates that it was not - that it was instead a very deliberate choice made in pursuit of long-term goals

    Netanyahu explicitly rejects a two-state solution. His goal is to annex all existing Palestinian territory.

    The Palestinian people are justifiably unwilling to submit to that, because they know that that way leads to them being made second-class citizens of an apartheid state.

    The only alternative then is for Israel to conquer those territories - to kill enough Palestinians to terrorize the rest into subjugation. And that is, certainly not coincidentally, the exact strategy they’re pursuing at this moment.

    And the Hamas attack is the specific thing that made it possible for them to do so with at least some colorable semblance of justification.

    Therefore, the only reasonable conclusion is that when the Israeli government learned of the planned attack, a deliberate choice was made to not move to prevent it - to allow it to happen, because it would serve Netanyahu’s purposes when it did. As it has.

    • V17
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This is absurd conspiracy-nut level of thinking. Among other reasons because this will likely end Netanyahu’s career after the war ends, he’s no longer immediately needed and investigations start (Israelis have a history of actually doing those properly because most see it as an existential threat to not have functioning defense mechanisms), and I’m pretty sure that he knows this. Which means that the reason for him to do this anyway would be because he’s so selfless that he doesn’t care about his career or power (even though after losing his career he’s likely to face lawsuits for other things he’s done) as long as this goal is completed. I hope you see how nonsensical it is for a super-populist politician under the threat of several investigations to selflessly give up his career and power.

    • @breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      It’s wild how many people buy into that conspiracy theory – or that someone could call something so bonkers the “only reasonable conclusion.” Security is Netanyahu’s central promise to Israelis. There is nothing that could be more damaging to him than appearing weak or incompetent on security. It’s the most tortured logic that would have you conclude that having the worst attack in the history of the country occur on his watch could somehow be good for him. His political career is over, his legacy is in tatters, and he’ll no longer be able to out-manoeuver his legal problems.

      Not to mention that he’d be executed for treason if he was complicit in the worst massacre of Jewish people since the Holocaust.

      Being disgraced, discredited, or dead doesn’t help Netanyahu meet his goals.

      • @anteaters@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        It’s typical antisemitism to invent conspiracies to blame the jews for the ills of the world.

  • BraveSirZaphod
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    I’m dearly hoping, and maybe even optimistic, that Israel will take a lesson moving forwards that, while the violence of two weeks ago was not and can never be justified, the underlying anger and resentment that produced it didn’t emerge from nowhere, and Netanyahu did a lot to very directly incite it. Israel needs to show that it will always be welcome towards working with Palestinians that are actually interested in moving towards peace, and actions like settlements in the West Bank and murdering journalists are not productive towards that aim.

    • @YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      199 months ago

      The lack of diplomacy is sickening. Both peoples should be able to live in harmony but both sides want to hurt the other. It has to stop and that starts with the government talking to one another.

      • @steventhedev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        It’s difficult to talk with an organization who’s stated purpose is the murder and destruction of your country. Doubly so when they have a proven track record of 15 years of negotiating ceasefires only after they ran out of rockets to use against civilians.

        Bottom line, Israel has stated the goal is to completely and permanently disarm Hamas and any other armed group in Gaza. Israelis will not accept any solution that leaves even a possibility for October 7th to repeat itself.

        Even a humanitarian ceasefire will be unlikely until after the ground campaign starts.

        • ShroOmeric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Israel will accept nothing that might prevent the ethnic cleansing and the stealing of the land you mean. Were you forgetting that part?

            • ShroOmeric
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              I did. It’s not uncivil because you don’t like it.

              • Spzi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                29 months ago

                It’s dishonest to pretend the other side shares your point of view, thus ignoring their point of view, as if it would not exist.

                A bit ironic to do so in a subthread which is all about the two sides should talk to each other.

                Maybe it only underlines how hard that is. We here have no stakes in that game and still cannot at least acknowledge other positions.