Linux has made significant strides, and in 2023, it’s better than ever. However, there are still individuals perpetuating a delusion: that desktop Linux is as user-friendly and productive as its mainstream counterparts. After a few discussions on Lemmy, I believe it’s important to provide a clear review of where Linux falls short as a daily driver for average users.

EDIT: can I just make it clear I don’t agree with this article one bit and think it’s an unhinged polemic?

    • vapeloki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows is an industry standard. And so is office. As long as we treat it as such. If we want things to change we have to go against such standards.

      The big difference between Office and Photoshop is: Microsoft opened their file format. And has support for open standards.

      Adobe locked their eco system down to build a monopoly. This is not gimps fault. It is 100% on Adobe.

      While the outcome is the same, I would love to see a different wording: nothing is an alternative to Photoshop, because Adobe has a monopoly.

        • vapeloki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is true. But in reality, it still works.

          And yes, the expansion of their Ecosystem is an issue. But to be honest: the cloud version works, and if I get a docx that is broken in Libreoffice, I use 365. At least I have this option.

          It’s a complicated topic with no real solution

            • vapeloki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is one alternative: anti monopoly legislation. Maybe, some day, if the EU gets their heads out of their asses, throw their privacy braking chat monitor out of the window, and start thinking again. In 30-40 years maybe