seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196 · 1 year agoADUHD rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up11.03K
arrow-up11.03KimageADUHD rulelemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196 · 1 year agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squarejandar_fett@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoAD4K? Brain still using LCD tech. Refresh rate is trash.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoTypically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDoesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice. But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoMy laptop is LCD and has 165 Hz refresh rate, although the resolution is QHD and not 4k
AD4K? Brain still using LCD tech. Refresh rate is trash.
I have a 4k60 LCD monitor, which is fine, right? It’s not 144, but good enough.
Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice.
But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
My laptop is LCD and has 165 Hz refresh rate, although the resolution is QHD and not 4k