• Prunebutt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    As far as I understand it, you can pay for a license, but you don’t have to?

    Exactly. Louis Rossman says that if you use it and don’t pay, that’s “between you and your god”.

      • Prunebutt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, then you can think of the world where no one pays for any OSS and developers still need to pay rent.

        Don’t feel bullied if you can’t afford it, but if you use it, you can afford the 5(?) bucks and you don’t pay for it: that is kind of considered a dick move.

        • loki@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, same as guilt tripping users by calling up on their religion. I’m not going to use it, I haven’t even seen a screenshot of it. It was a sarcastic comment. I’m fine with newpipe FOSS project.

            • ink@r.nf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              it’s meant to make you feel bad as if god is going to judge you if you don’t pay. It’s what religion has been doing for generations.

              “if you come to church and don’t tithe, it’s between you and god”

              See how that has made pastors very rich? if you can’t see that, honestly, good for you…

              • Prunebutt@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah, that’s not what he meant, though. It is clearly not meant as a serious “your yod is going to judge you”, but rather “I’m counting on the honor system and if you abuse my trust, you’re probably a dick, but I can’t do anything about it”.

                Stop thinking being an atheist is a substitute for an actual personality.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        He had a sound reason why that’s not the case, and that’s to keep control over what people do to it. Namely they want to prevent redistribution with added trackers/ads/malware.

          • kraniax@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            no need for that! people can just take an apk and slap ads or malware on top. they do it all the time with fake candy crush apks. So I’m pretty sure they won’t care about this license.

            I think that in this case it’s just a excuse so no one is redistributing the app and they can make money from it.