• Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s ok, you’ll learn how to read implied context one day - if you keep trying just a bit harder.

    Now that we have that solved, do you or do you not believe traitor trump would be in jail if he weren’t a bratty trust fund con artist?

    Or are you going to continue to avoid the reality that rich people don’t have laws applied to them like regular people?

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He said it blows his mind, therefore the implication is he views him as his equal.

      It’s ok, you’ll learn how to read implied context one day - if you keep trying just a bit harder.

      The rest of your ramblings are strawmen, our argument was over my comment

      • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope. That was not the implication. I’ve tried to explain it to you multiple times and it still somehow isn’t making it through to you. Makes sense I suppose

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          He said 2 things 1)trump is not getting the same treatment as he would 2)that fact blows his mind. This could only be mindblowing if he viewed him as his equal.

          Also you “explained” stuff once, when you claimed he considers himself normal, when did the multiple times happen? Does the strawman trust fund baby avoiding jail count as explanation? As if I didnt already mention him being ex president which matters 100x more than his money. Youre making shit up every message, must be exhausting for people to talk to you irl.