• stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay so you’re arguing pedantics. Let’s do it.

    Can you find any official global sources that define terrorism vs an act of war?

    I couldn’t but I only checked for a short while.

    • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does arguing pedantics mean? Note pedantics isn’t a word.

      Yes the UN codes regarding war crimes.

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Arguing pedantics = conversational way of saying that you are being pedantic.

        Define terrorism not war crimes, obviously. Nobody was arguing for the definition of war crimes, and just because something isn’t a formal war crime, doesn’t mean it’s not something else (which would possibly include but not limit to only terrorism)

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know what they meant.

        You are still being pedantic arguing about semantics.

        If you have to obscure your animus behind a veil of linguistics then you don’t actually have one.

        Is that a big enough vocab for you