• Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 年前

    It is dystopian. It looks like a alpha version of the robocop “bad” robots. It is indeed dystopian. It doesn’t fire autonomously just because creators could not implement a “directive 4” (don’t shoot who I don’t want to be shoot).

      • hazelnot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 年前

        I have news about them too: they’re not actually coming anytime soon, it’s all techbro propaganda

          • vzq
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 个月前

            deleted by creator

          • hazelnot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 年前

            Yeah, and they keep blocking emergency vehicles in intersections and the whole city wants them gone.

            They’re prototypes using real human cities as proving grounds without the consent of the population.

      • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        It is not. Dystopian is an utopia turning bad. There is nothing wrong with AI, it pays my bills. The killing is what turns an utopia to a dystopia. It’s people actions and intentions, not technologies

          • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            1 年前
            • AI and autonomous vehicles: utopia
            • AI and autonomous vehicles to kill: dystopian

            This is one of the most frustrating thread I’ve ever partecipated. Why discussions on weapons always turn out like talking to spoilt 4 years old kids.

          • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 年前

            What do you mean? AI is super helpful, it is doing great things in many fields, including biological research, simplify life of many, supporting and helping people. It is just an umbrella name for many different complex mathematical functions.

            Clearly there are bad uses, as any powerful technology. And it is important to highlight them. This is a bad use of AI

            • bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 年前

              Which altruistic thing is it that the AI that pays your bills does? It appears to me that AI is used for acceleration of war, deceit, and theft and conglomeration of ideas and art with no unique thoughts or perspectives. The people who own the technology will use it to enrich themselves at the expense of those who can not afford it. This is what I mean.

              • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 年前

                Some of the models I built help preventing frauds on customers, i.e. help them keeping their money.

                Others support and simplify work of colleagues. There are jobs that are difficult, not pleasant and stressful in my industry, and there is an high demand from people to get help from AI.

                I don’t know your job, but AI can be very helpful improving quality of life of people in many roles.

                BTW AI has been used by artists for years now. I am not talking about generative AI. Photoshop is full of non generative AI tools. Even the spam filters of your email provider are likely nowadays AI.

                You should have a deeper look to all enormous variety of AI applications out there

          • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 年前

            It is just because it is currently technically impossibile to make it fires the “right” people. So the human will fire the wrong people as liability for human shooting civilians doesn’t exist. It is anyway dystopian. As said it is an alpha version of the dystopia.

            I really don’t get why it is so hard to understand ¯\_(ツ)_/¯