haxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agoYouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end "$600 less than cable" adsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up134file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up134external-linkYouTube TV, which costs $73 a month, agrees to end "$600 less than cable" adsarstechnica.comhaxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareKlystron@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoYouTube TV isn’t YouTube premium
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYouTube Premium actually makes sense if you use it instead of Spotify or Pandora. It costs the same as their ad free music services, not seeing ads on videos is just a bonus.
minus-squaremr_sifl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoYeah definitely. I switched when my previous employer blocked Spotify, definitely an added bonus. I honestly forgot YouTube has ads. I also use YouTube TV during NFL season. It’s a little spendy but no contract and it gets the job done.
YouTube TV isn’t YouTube premium
YouTube Premium actually makes sense if you use it instead of Spotify or Pandora.
It costs the same as their ad free music services, not seeing ads on videos is just a bonus.
Yeah definitely. I switched when my previous employer blocked Spotify, definitely an added bonus. I honestly forgot YouTube has ads. I also use YouTube TV during NFL season. It’s a little spendy but no contract and it gets the job done.