• Izzy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t believe that without some extremely substantial evidence.

    • andyburke@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So far, these things are clearly statistics with extra steps. Like you, I need to see some serious evidence before I would begin to believe this in the slightest.

      • Izzy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think I’d be more easily convinced that humans are just statistics with extra steps than machine learning / language models such as ChatGPT are sentient.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, if they could essentially “remove” the limited context window, I would be tempted to call it AGI. Not perfect by any stretch, but good enough to pass my personal Turing Test.