You must log in or register to comment.
I don’t believe that without some extremely substantial evidence.
So far, these things are clearly statistics with extra steps. Like you, I need to see some serious evidence before I would begin to believe this in the slightest.
I think I’d be more easily convinced that humans are just statistics with extra steps than machine learning / language models such as ChatGPT are sentient.
Honestly, if they could essentially “remove” the limited context window, I would be tempted to call it AGI. Not perfect by any stretch, but good enough to pass my personal Turing Test.