So here we go again…

Please direct all comments and links regarding the actual VOTING to this thread.

Edit Confirmed, Mike Johnson is the next speaker after running the table of all present and voting Republicans, 220 to Hakeem Jeffries 209.

If you’d like to know more about Mike Johnson, here’s a good link:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/25/who-is-mike-johnson-republican-2020-election

I’ll leave this pinned for 24 hours so everyone can catch up, then take it down.

1st vote count is in:

Hakeem Jeffries - 212 (217 needed to win)
Jim Jordan - 200
Steve Scalise - 7
Kevin McCarthy - 6
“Others” - 7

Jordan could have only lost 4 votes, he lost 20.

2nd vote:

Jeffries - 212
Jordan - 199
Scalise - 7
McCarthy - 5
Zeldin - 3
“Others” - 7 (one each)

Edit 3rd vote is in, House in recess.

Jeffries - 210
Jordan - 194
Scalise - 8
McHenry - 6
Zeldin - 4
Donalds - 2
McCarthy - 2
“Others” - 3 (1 each)

Matt Gaetz has vowed to oppose expanding the powers for McHenry:

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4265284-gaetz-will-do-everything-possible-stop-empowering-mchenry/

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    1 year ago

    The guy described HIMSELF as “David Duke without the baggage.” I’ve never seen a word do as much lifting as the word “baggage” as he used it.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, the Republican Party is down with the KKK. The mask is off, isn’t it?

    Will the “liberal media” please catch up?

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Scalise beat Jordan 113-99.

    Democrats unanimously renominated House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.,

    To win the gavel, a candidate needs support from a majority of the House members present, meaning the eventual speaker will need 217 votes if every one of the current members votes and does so for a candidate by name. There are currently 433 members, with two vacancies, so a majority is 217.

    If members are absent, or if some vote present instead of supporting a candidate, that decreases what the majority vote needs to be. The House is intended to have a total membership of 435 members, so a majority is usually 218.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m looking forward to watching the Democrats stay united behind Jeffries for every single vote. Again.

    • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Steve Scalise barely beat Jim Jordan, who *if I’m not mistaken, is the guy that helped cover up a bunch of sexual abuse? That Jim Jordan?

      • oracle3102@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jim Jordan is the sexual abuse cover up guy at OSU. Scalise is the blatant white supremacist who speaks at hate group events (see European-American Unity and Rights Organization which was founded by David Duke who used to head the KKK) and also compared himself to David Duke.

        • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wait, Gym Jordan and Jim Jordan are the same two people, responsible for covering up multiple occurrences of sexual abuse at Ohio State University and also being a Republican representative?

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, his name is Jim Jordan, but the assaults he covered up happened in relation to an atheletics program, hence “Gym Jordan”.

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a long shot, but Moderate Republicans and McCarthy supporters could cast a vote for Democrat Jefferies as a FU to the Freedom Caucus. They would likely be able to get things done as a result.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, I’m really don’t understand why this didn’t happen last time.

      Surely there have to be a few Republicans in Blue leaning districts that just barely got voted in and are at risk of losing their seat next election.

      There is just so much to gain by putting country above party under those circumstances.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That will never happen. It’s much more likely IMHO for Democrats to throw some votes at a moderate Republican to get them over the line. Not Kevin, probably not Steve Scalise.

      Becoming Speaker is only part of the story, though. The Speaker sets the agenda (meaning the day’s schedule) but that agenda is subject to a vote and needs a majority every single time. So any Democrats who support a Republican (or vice versa) would have to be relied on to vote in favor of that speaker’s scheduling, otherwise nothing can be scheduled.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it is very unlikely to happen, but still more likely than any Republicans voting for Democrats.

      • donuts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only way one side is voting for the other’s nominee is if they get a deal with some real concessions. I don’t see it happening.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Meanwhile in Canada we just got free (covered) dental care for youth, and will be getting a pharmacare plan because 1 party needed the others support to govern and gave concession.

          Imagine what they could actually do in the US if they actually worked together out of this madness.

          Edit: There’s gotta be hundreds of things moderates in both parties could agree to as concessions for joint support.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jeffries was picked by the House Democrats. It’s not a long shot, it’s 100% fever dream impossible that any Republicans would just vote for the Democrat option.

      The long shot is getting a group of half moderate Republicans and half moderate Democrats and picking a Republican speaker who is moderate. That’s not going to happen either.

      The barely realistic possibility of bipartisan Speaker votes is a few moderate Democrats vote for a Republican candidate.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Jeffries is probably closer than Scalise.

        When they finally do a vote, I can see the ranking of Jeffries #1, Scalise #2, whoever else is dumb enough to run #3.

        With none of them getting 217, but Jeffries hitting 209 or 210.

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    There we go! One of the Dems had the balls to call him what he is. A fucking insurrectionist. Fuck Gym Jorden and the Republican party.

  • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You all should see the picture in “Jim Jordan fails to win the speakership on first ballot” at CNN. Absolutely hilarious.

    Oh man, my day has absolutely been brightened.

    EDIT: Here, I’ll try posting a picture:

    • Midnight@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least one member said they were switching from McCarthy to Jordan on the second vote, so sadly we’re probably not going to get a revolt.

    • Kale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      A politician and a political party has two domains they operate in: policy and governance. Policy is where a politician stands on issues, and typically where almost all of the campaigning happens. Where does this politician stand on healthcare, gun control, environment, etc.

      But governance is as important, both for the individual and for the political party. For the politician: can they build consensus? Can they prevent alienating their constituents. Can they set goals that are big, but achievable. And for the political party, governance is how well they develop their members. Identifying who fits best in each elected position. How to help members gain experience for other offices. How to identify up-and-coming politicians.

      The GOP is currently experiencing a failure of governance. The HOR is unable to operate because the GOP can’t effectively govern. And time is ticking on one of the core HOR duties: approving the budget. The GOP is not getting high quality people into the correct positions, and has too many obstinate people in place to govern.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    jim jordan: this is the worst day of my life

    kevin mccarthy: the worst day of your life so far

  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Johnson, one of the most conservative options imaginable, won probably because Republicans were sick of the chaos.

    They are currently in the fuck around phase, and when it comes time to do the budget, will find out. Johnson will either trigger a shutdown and get all the blame onto the Republicans by refusing to compromise (and further prove the crazies have taken over the party) or he’ll get a deal with Democrats and then Gaetz will yeet him again.

    I give it until… Dec 1. Until speaker elections begin again.