People Are Okay With Wind & Solar Installations In Their Neighborhoods, Studies Say::More neighborhoods than ever are accepting the role of solar and wind power installations near their homes and towns.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find both solar panels and wind turbines to be quite beautiful and aesthetic when done at least half well. However turbines do have its issues with noise and shadows so I definitely wouldn’t want one close by.

    • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      My in-laws had a neighbor with a turbine for years and it could get really loud on a windy day. That said if I have to choose between coal and a little noise, I’d still choose the noise.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the issue with fossil fuels is that their damage is not as apparent as a 100meter tall bird smasher. Thats why this conflict is so complex.

          • erwan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are not as many wind turbines as there are cats in the US. You need some kind of normalization otherwise it’s not telling you what is the impact of installing a new wind turbine farm.

            Also there is a chance that birds killed by cats were already weak and soon to die.

            • Mangosniper@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              2400000000 / 58000000 ~ 41. 234000 / 70000 ~ 3. If we talking about preserving birds I would still address the cat issue before the wind turbine issue.

              Also there is a chance that birds killed by cats windturbines were already weak and soon to die.

              Don’t take the above sentence seriously. It’s just to show that arguments that seem nice might not hold their value at second glance.

              • bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If we talking about preserving birds I would still address the cat issue before the wind turbine issue.

                I for one fully support never allowing cats outside unless they have a wind turbine attached to them.

            • onion@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              But we aren’t planning to install as many wind turbines as there are cats, so you don’t need to directly compare

                • mriguy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No it isn’t. The rate of birds killed is not important. The NUMBER of birds killed is, and wind turbines are just a rounding error in the number of birds killed. Even if we increased the number of turbines to supply all of the country’s electricity, it would STILL not be anywhere near as many as cats.

          • Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s only 70,000 wind turbins, and 58,000,000 cats. Say, do you live in a building with glass?

            • Mangosniper@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uhm… 2400000000 / 58000000 ~ 41. 234000 / 70000 ~ 3. If we talking about preserving birds I would still address the cat issue before the wind turbine issue.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not saying turbines are bird smasher. I’m saying that’s what an average person thinks. Also clearly they kill birds which is an exactly the issue. You can see wind turbines damage standing next to it and you can’t see fossil fuel damage unfortunately.

            • Mangosniper@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              In comparison with the other issues we have, the bird Windturbine one is a non-issue. However, it gets thrown in the ring over and over again, achieving exactly what the people persuing it want: distraction. It’s the same with nuclear, it’s the same with “ but we can’t store the energy“. A lot of decoys to slow down the process while we already have everything we need to take on the problem. Please people, don’t take the bait, focus on implementing the solution.

                • Mangosniper@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Probably. I still find a lot of people here on Lemmy (and the other fuck you spez platform before) that are very very convinced we need to reroute a substantial amount of our effort into building nuclear reactors as renewables can never ever sustain everything and in general there is no storage.

                  But you are right in general.