• HuddaBudda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t speak for him, but off the top of my head…

          Article 49 of the 4th Geneva convention accords:

          49: Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as
          deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the
          territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
          occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.

          Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or
          partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or
          imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not
          involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of
          the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is
          impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall
          be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area
          in question have ceased.

          The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations
          shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper
          accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that
          the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene,
          health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family
          are not separated.

          The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and
          evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
          The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an
          area particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security
          of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
          The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its
          own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

          I don’t hate Israel, in fact I think it is in America’s best interest to protect our spy network assets. Though, I will not stand for people making misleading statements about war crimes. We can do better.

            • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t see how 49 has anything to do with air strikes.

              It has to do with an active warzone or areas hitherto, which Israel just declared.

              Keep in mind, I am not even looking at their past, I am looking at the here and now and seeing what they are doing,

              49 is about moving people from an occupied area.

              Which Hamas currently… occupies… the southern part of Israel.

              Unless Israel is just fighting civilians, then we have a whole other set of war crimes.

    • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israel isn’t exactly operating with improvised explosives. Israel is one of the most well-funded militaries in the region and has enough Western guided munitions to fend off all their neighbours.

      Either Western munitions are absolute garbage or Israel is going “oopsie doopsie I totally didn’t see those civilians!”

        • Collision Resistance@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you are naive enough to think that a bombing a “jam-packed refugee camp” was an honest mistake, then I have a bridge to sell you, going very very cheap.

            • Collision Resistance@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Blowing up buildings and jam-packed refugee camps, knowing fully well that it’ll create mass civilian casualties is a war crime. And I’d rather take the word of experts rather than a nobody over this.

              Quoting from the article itself

              But human rights groups have previously said that Israel’s pattern of deadly attacks on residential homes display a disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians and argued they may amount to war crimes.

              The article quotes a previous article Human Rights Watch: Israeli war crimes apparent in Gaza war

              Human Rights Watch on Tuesday accused the Israeli military of carrying out attacks that “apparently amount to war crimes” during an 11-day war in May against the Hamas militant group.

              The international human rights organization issued its conclusions after investigating three Israeli airstrikes that it said killed 62 Palestinian civilians. It said “there were no evident military targets in the vicinity” of the attacks.

              So yeah, brush it off as “Mistakes happen” somewhere else

            • stifle867@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              My original comment never explicitly called out Israel nor Hamas, and for good reason. You’re the one that claimed, and I quote, “read the article, there was no war crime”. The line I quoted was pulled directly from the article.

              I’m sure now you will be correcting your original claim, right?

                • stifle867@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, YOU were talking about Israel. My comment was “clearly” as general as I could make it. You replied to MY original comment, the onus is on you to understand the subject of my comment.

                  Instead of being intellectually honest about your mixup, you’re re-defining the goal posts. You challenged me to find a single part in the article that would classify as a war crime and to also provide the exact war crime committed. I did exactly that, as requested.