• Sybil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      again: terrorist isn’t a meaningful epithet.

      but you do seem obsessed with my feelings

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No I don’t even know who you are. I’ve never read your screen name. You could be the initial person I responded to or just some other idiot terrorist sympathizer.

        • Sybil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          no one is sympathising with terrorists for any objective application of the label, because objective application of that label is impossible.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it’s pretty easy. When you force your way into a place specifically to murder civilians with no other goal other than to spread terror, you’re a terrorist.

            You agreeing with terrorists makes you a bad person, it doesn’t make them “not terrorists.”

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              terrorist isn’t an objective label, no matter how much emotionally charged language you use. what you described is murder. calling it terrorism is a political position.