Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don’t get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.

Then on Oct 1, they threw up a “You’re using an Ad Blocker” overlay on videos. I’d use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn’t have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.

Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.

Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.

Now all I see is this.

Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.

I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can’t view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.

  • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You should educate yourself on the topic. theres really more to it than “how much storage can fit on an sd card.” operating at the size and scope of youtubes database and userbase really is a challenge and considering how smoothly youtube runs for the most part isnt “pennies” worth of operating cost

    Plus, its already known from their earnings reports that youtubes profit mostly comes from ads

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Youtube the subsidiary, yeah. Because youtube the subsidiary does not do any data selling. Alphabet does. Alphabet is also the ones paying for every single step in the youtube process.

      Because they make their money selling data. Not ads.

      For someone telling others to educate themselves on the topic, you really dont understand how corporate earnings works, huh?

      • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        can you provide a source for alphabet paying for youtubes operating costs? i work for a subsidiary of a different rather large it consulting company (80k+ members) and we very much do and have our own budgeting because we are a profit generating subsidiary

        odd that alphabet would pay for youtube’s operating costs since youtube operates at a multi-billion dollar profit.

        and i apologize for presuming youre not educated in the industry. it actually came off worse than i meant. just some of your comments just do not align with my experience in the industry.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not a source I can cite without risking a friends job, which isnt worth an internet argument.

          Alphabet wants youtube making profit, obviously, but they are a data selling business. They didnt buy youtube up because they wanted a cut of their ad market. They shunt data upstream like its their primary job. And from my understanding? Thats exactly how youtube is viewed internally.

          So, yeah, Im not really pressed about ad blockers. The company has no funding issues.

          • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            so… you were calling me ignorant because of info youve gathered from a friend? lol …

            yeah, lets not waste anymore of our time here. have a good day.

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Did I call you ignorant, at all?

              Yeah if you need to invent things Ive said, maybe its best you stop here.

              Especially since you apparently have no issue citing your personal insider info, but are incensed that I shared my own with you.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Oh sorry, were you willing to show me your companies internal pricing and expense reports?

                  Where I work thats insanely confidential and not even remotely public, and sharing it would get me sued into homelessness. Would get something similar for my buddy, I am sure.

                  My bad, I didnt realize your were gung ho to pass around internal documents.