Looking to dip my toes into Linux for the first time. I have a 2016 Intel MacBook Pro with pretty solid specs collecting dust right now that I think I’m going to use. Research so far has indicated to me that the two best options for me are likely Mint or Elementary OS. Does anyone have any insight? Also open to other OS’s. I would consider myself decently tech savvy but I am not a programmer or anything. Comfortable dipping into the terminal when the need arises and all that.

@linux #linux

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mint is full easy-mode. Definitely try that for your first. You can even run it off the USB as a live distro and get a feel for it. Go for the Gnome desktop version, it is prettier than XFCE, just a little heavier.

    Mess around with that, break it, fix it, have fun.

  • neinhorn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Give fedora a try. It has everything you would need from a modern “vanilla” linux distro and no user telemetry tracking.

      • s20@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, Fedora has opt-in telemetry. It’s 100% anonymized, though, and helps with development. I always say yes when I’m running a beta (like now).

        That having been said, you should always check the privacy policies of any given distro. They tend to all be pretty up front about it (kinda hard to lie about it when anyone can check your source code…).

        AFAIK, though, neither Mint nor Elementary collect telemetry by default, although they might have opt-in like Fedora. Both are based on Ubuntu LTS, but they also both scrape out so much stuff that they’re devoid of most of the Canonical junk.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No Linux distro “tracks” like Windows, Android, iOS or macOS do. This is nonsense. Fedora may introduce opt-something telemitry that will just help make the Distro better, and via one single setting you can always enable or disable it.

        I have full data sharing on KDE and also report lots of bugs.

        Pro-tip: set your username as “user” do avoid doxxing yourself uploading debug logs

      • astraeus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mint doesn’t by default, but it is based on Canonical’s Ubuntu which is not the most privacy friendly distro. Depending on how you install your software, some telemetry might go to Canonical.

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, any general purpose distro will do fine. I’d watch a YouTube review of Elementary and Mint and see what you think. I’d also throw in Ubuntu and Fedora, as they run a more modern desktop that might be more interesting to you as a Mac user than Mint, which is Windows-like out of the box.

    Keep in mind: choosing a distro is sort of like choosing your first car. It’s fine to have a taste, but don’t let the decision paralyze you, because 90% of learning to drive will be exactly the same regardless of what car you choose. Likewise, 90% of linux will be the same regardless of your distro.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TL;Dr elementary will give you what you want if you like Mac’s interface. Depending on the complexity of the thing you’re doing you won’t need to dip into the terminal too much

    Elementary was my favourite out of all of em until I moved to NixOS so I’d recommend that especially coming from Mac

    Realistically distro doesn’t really matter that much with a few exceptions (arch, NixOS, qubes all do something different) the thing you’ll want to pay more attention to is desktop environment

    Main 3 imo are GNOME (looks kinda like android, everything is setup sensibly but not much customisation) KDE (looks like windows 10 out of the box and functions in a similar way, very customisable) XFCE (looks kinda like windows XP/7, one of the most lightweight ones)

    Elementary uses a modified version of gnome (I believe) called Pantheon

    Pop uses their own spin on gnome though they’re currently writing their own

    Mint uses their own DE called Cinnanon

    Ubuntu and fedora I believe both use gnome by default but can also be installed with others

  • mogul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I started on Linux with some old distros that aren’t around anymore but went to Ubuntu eventually and then played with different distros after that. There is a lot of opinions on how things should be in the Linux world and that’s what makes choice so awesome.

    I say start with Ubuntu because there is TONS of documentation and help on forums, users are generally super helpful unlike some other distros and it’s a solid STARTING point. Honestly you’ll end up distro hoping like we all are guilty of so you won’t stay on one for a long time.

    Mint is another solid choice as is pop_OS!

    Debian is great as a base but I found it lacking in bells and whistles early into my Linux days. Stay away from the Chinese distros, they’ll make you sad (not because they’re Chinese made but the lack of work being put into them).

    Have fun trying every flavor out and enjoy breaking your system from time to time and eventually try Arch or even Gentoo lol

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think mint and pop are generally the distros people recommend over Ubuntu nowadays

      Documentation for Ubuntu generally works for anything Ubuntu based and they’re specifically designed for newbies coming from Windows

      That said they’re coming from Mac so elementary might be better

      • mogul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They never said they were coming from Mac. You are correct in regards to Mint and pop_OS! tho, I just think the recommending of other Ubuntu based or even other based distros nowadays is just so “political”. Canonical isn’t the darling it once was but it’s still a good distros to cut teeth on especially because you can easily hope to another spin for a new DE and still be on “Ubuntu”.

        One of the things that makes Linux so great is the freedom of choice and the shear amount of options available so we can all use a distro from a person/community/company that shares in our values/ideals that we can then go on to tell everyone that they should be running it lol.

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve had numerous issues running Ubuntu and any Ubuntu based distros on my laptop, that’s why I personally dislike it

          The fact that they’re starting to make questionable decisions around snap is just extra reason imo

          Also op didn’t say they were coming from Mac but did say they were planning to put Linux on one they already have, think it’s a safe guess that they might be used to macos

          • mogul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Laptops are always iffy when running Linux, so many proprietary things in them but I am surprised you had so much trouble with an Ubuntu based distro.

            I’m not used to MacOS myself but I did have a MacBook and I currently have an iMac running Lubuntu. Multiple environments makes things interesting lol.

                • flashgnash@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Out of all the distro hopping I’ve found NixOS is the most solid. That said, my built in microphone sounds atrocious for some reason on nix

  • Noa Himesaka@lemmy.funami.tech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does your Mac have Touch Bar? If so, you should try using t2linux-provided ISOs. Although 2016 MBP isn’t T2 equipped Mac, the Touch Bar driver should be compatible AFAIK.

  • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mint and Pop OS are fantastic. Both have great support out of the box and lots of help out there on the Internet.

    If you’re trying to game I would flatly say Pop OS. General computing, both are a tie for me. They just work (as far as Linux goes).

  • jarredpickles87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a long time dabbler and recent full on Mint user, I would recommended either Ubuntu or Mint for a first timer for sure. I would say that I enjoy Mint more just because I like the look and feel of the Cinnamon DE more over the Gnome DE or whatever it is that Ubuntu ships default with. Mint is very easy to use, doesn’t have lots of major updates all the time so it doesn’t break and it’s relatively light weight.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You will get very different opinions here. Important are what you want to do

    • are you okay with only Flatpak apps?
    • do you want a really stable Distro, or more up to date updates? Desktops evolve, but your hardware doesnt need that new kernels etc.
    • do you need a traditional distro for installing loads of stuff to it, or is an immutable Distro “enough”?
    • are you willing to reinstall or unbreak a traditional distro?

    I would recommend Fedora Kinoite. Install the official image or use the Ublue image. They are recent but checked updates, versioned, resettable, etc. With Fedora and lots of other distros you have automatic backups, if an update may break something.

    Its basically the future of Linux, at least for most use cases.

    PS: I literally broke evey other Distro, most of the recommended ones here.

    • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While disagreeing, I still upvoted. I think more people should see this suggestion and add their opinion too.


      I’m a huge fan of SB/ uBlue, but I don’t know if I would recommend it to a new user.

      For me personally, it’s the best distro ever. It’s reliable, modern, AND it doesn’t break.

      I’m the most talented person ever to break my stuff. I already managed to do that, even on on SB and fixing the kernel panic (+other breakages), which I would have done by reinstalling, was only one reboot and boom, it worked again. I just want to get my tasks done (gaming, etc.) and knowing I never have to spend a weekend reinstalling is godsend.


      BUT, things just work differently, and sometimes more complicated. You never install something traditionally, only per container (e.g. Distrobox or Flatpak), which is extremely uncommon. And, there are still here and there some limitations. For example, you will never install a VPN client, since they want to interact and change the base system, which they can’t


      I would recommend something Debian-based, like Mint. If you don’t tinker, they also never break. And most guides are for exactly those distros.


      SB is more for either people you KNOW that they will never explore the system (e.g. my mum) and only use their device like a tablet,

      or who are exactly this advanced in their Linux journey that they begin tinkering without knowing what they’re doing, breaking their system and not being able to fix it themselves. Or they begin distrohopping.

      I for example always broke any distro somehow “without doing anything wrong”. Reinstalling was always easier than fixing for me.

      And I was a huge distrohopper too, which is fixed by now.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes I also broke lots of distros, (Linux Mint, Kubuntu, KDE Neon, Fedora KDE) and switched away from MXLinux (too old) and Manjaro (bad reputation even though great experience)

        You can install packages normally? I think you got something wrong here.

        Just do rpm-ostree install app or rpm-ostree install /path/to/app.rpm for local RPMs. Like normal actually.

        Yes agree and agree, I broke everything else.

        I disagree with Debian. Apt is horrible, updates are bad. Linux Mint is nice, but the Desktop is still X11 which is now basically unmaintained. You will probably get no real support for X11, and I dont know how long it will take the devs to get XFCE / Cinnamon to Wayland.

        I mean I literally had an issue with the otherwise great MXLinux, where my Nextcloud simply didnt work, because the client was a vew versions too old.

        Debian is all about preinstalling stuff, which is pretty annoying, and thus native packages. Debian with auto updates and only Flatpaks maybe, but like it is, no way.

        • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can install packages normally? I think you got something wrong here.

          Yeah, you can, that’s right. But it’s absolutely not recommended (except drivers or stuff like that). You only do that when there is absolutely no other way.

          But I’m not that exactly sure on how “bad” it is on rpm-ostree tbh. I’ve definitively done my research when I switched to Silverblue, and reason for the direct-install-disrecommendation didn’t get explained good enough for me. Afaik it is only an additional layer on top of the base, so it is also not OS-changing. Please do me the favor and explain it to me if you can :)

          I disagree with Debian. Apt is horrible, updates are bad.

          I said “Debian based”, not plain Debian. I never got warm with it tbh, for deskop I prefer rpm-based distros, I don’t even know why. But, like it or not, Ubuntu (and therefore Debian) is just the standard if you google " how to do x on Linux". And a newcomer, who doesn’t know the difference between apt and dnf for example, will get into trouble sooner or later.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            True Ubuntu and debian is standard and to this day many external Devs just provide .deb files or now even snaps XD

            So layering, as far as I understood:

            1. your OS on your PC, every package traced through OSTree as with using Git
            2. an ostree remote, which is not directly a repository but the exact OS they build.
            3. Your PC compares the packages with the packages there and downloads the diffs.
            4. Your PC then builds another image, being exactly the one on their servers

            If you install/layer additional RPMs, after 3. you have an additional step, where rpm-ostree also uses traditional Fedora repos and downloads regular RPMs to your system. You can use any regular Repos, even COPR but you need to add the .repo files manually to /etc/yum.repos.d/. RPMFusion has a fancy way where you layer a package and that handles the updating of the repo files to your current version, really nice.

            So this package is installed along, and as its done through rpm-ostree its very well traced. It will do changes but an rpm-ostree uninstall PACKAGE will completely remove it again. If you are not entirely sure rpm-ostree reset will completely reset your system to be a mirror of the ostree remote.

            If you have a background service, you could reset the system every month or so. Not necessary but this would make extra sure your system directories are not weirdly modified. You would do this through

            rpm-ostree reset --install PACKAGE1 --install PACKAGE2
            

            Or maybe that doesnt work, not sure, and you need

            rpm-ostree reset && rpm-ostree install PACKAGE1 PACKAGE2
            

            Here you can also remove added packages like Kwrite or firefox + firefox-langpacks

  • Gamey@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who got started with Linux using Mint too years ago I think you got a great selection there and I wouldn’tup listen too much to the comments, big oarts of the Linux crowd on Lemmy came from Lemmy and it’s toxic and shitty so they will tell you you are wrong no matter what you do or say and recommend terribble things to newcomers! Just flash Mint Cinnamon or Elementary on a USB stick, boot them up and play around with both before you decide which you want to install. I am a Fedora Gnome user myself and as someone who probably values simplicity (mac user) Gnome could be interesting to check out too but it’s very different to anything else out there and you already got two great options to try there! :)

      • Gamey@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a fantastic distro to get started, I think the main advantage are various GUI tools for more advanced things that other distros usually require the Terminal for which can be a bit scarry at first. Elementary looks a lot more like MacOS and might be a little more familiar at first while Mint has a fairly similar layout to traditional Windows (7/10), keep in mind that nether of them is a copy tho and you will run into differences. I do think that Mint is the best beginner Distro because of those GUI tools but it can’t hurt to try both, almost all Linux distros have live boot to play with them from a USB stick first so you won’t have to actually install anything to check them out. In case you go for Mint make sure to pay attention to the welcome screen once you installed it, that guides you through a lot of stuff like configuring automatic backups and the driver manager to download potentialky missing drivers!

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Gamey

          @linux

          While I would never say I’m proficient at it, I am ok at navigating via terminal commands and such. Following directions in particular isn’t an issue. But yes I would prefer to use a GUI when possible of course.

          • Gamey@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The terminal is fantastic once you roughly understand what the commands you execute do but that requires a bit of experience and it’s great to have GUI tools for certain things. Modern Linux usually covers everything a normal user should need with GUI tools but there are always edge cases where you have to do something more advanced and I feel like especially those are tough to do in a terminal for new users which is why I appreciate Mint so much! It’s been quite a few years since I switched so many things are different by now but I moved back to Windows two times myself from Kubuntu and Manjaro before I discovered Mint so I never get tired to recommend it. Good luck on your journey! ;)