seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196 · 1 year agoWhat could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1356
arrow-up1356imageWhat could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3?lemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196 · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agomicrosoft’s content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
minus-squaretryagain@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoMy grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
minus-squareSmorty [she/her]linkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-21 year agoThat’s why the post mentions unfiltered.
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agobut the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
minus-squareVuraniute@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agowhat does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
A lot of pron I think
microsoft’s content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
My grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
That’s why the post mentions unfiltered.
but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
Not with that attitude.
what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
why do you think that? /s