Israeli airstrikes destroyed a tower block in Gaza City after Hamas militants launched a rocket and air attack on Israel in the early hours of Saturday morning.

The Israeli army launched Operation Iron Swords against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, with Israel’s president, Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the country, is ‘at war’.

Al Jazeera journalist Youmna El Sayed was reporting live from Gaza the moment the missile struck Palestine Tower behind her.

Sources in Gaza said at least 198 Palestinians were killed in the strikes

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let me know when Gaza has surgical strike capability. With the type of rockets they’re using you can’t really target hospitals because you can’t really target them at all, they’re ludicrously imprecise. Little better than a potato cannon.

    People fight with what they have. The more desperate, the dirtier. It is way too easy to sit in your chair in front of your computer, presumably with a fully stocked fridge, reliable water, sewage, and electricity, technical marvels just a mouse click and next-day delivery away, and make moral judgements about people fighting for sheer survival with little more than sticks and stones.

    Do I condone it? Nah. Both sides are invariably assholes, and not everything Hamas does is goal-directed enough to be categorised as “dirty war”. There’s lots of plain hatred in there. But then that hatred isn’t exactly unfounded.

    And at that point we’re getting to a “If you deny me things, then I will deny you things” territory. The mutual assured destruction instinct: “Sure I may lose but I’ll make sure that you lose, too”. Eye for an eye. That, yes, means simply inflicting suffering. We’re past morals at this point, this is human instinct, or one branch of the genome telling the other “yo, cut it out”. It’s bigger and way more natural – in the metal sense – than the quaint and lofty systems we build in our heads.

    …which brings me to why I even replied to your comment: We wouldn’t be in that situation, we could make moral judgements we’d actually feel good about, if Israel wasn’t tightening thumbscrews to mush levels just to inflict suffering, like the whole water situation in Gaza. And there’s no, absolutely no justification for that, as Israelis very much are not struggling for survival themselves.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’re past morals at this point, this is human instinct, or one branch of the genome telling the other “yo, cut it out”. It’s bigger and way more natural – in the metal sense – than the quaint and lofty systems we build in our heads.

      So… terrorism.

      No. That’s inexcusable.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We would not be the social beings that we are without that underlying threat level. Our whole capacity to emphasise and be kind hinges on being able to tell when we crossed a line with others, and for that people have to have lines that can be crossed.

        What’s inexcusable is not the instinct, we all have it, but pushing people to a point where it breaks through. Be that to get rid of them, or to galvanise the in-group, as fascists do.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          being able to tell when we crossed a line with others

          You mean like Hamas does with their murder, rape, and parading or civilian corpses?

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Like Israel is doing by depriving Gaza of the necessities for life even though they themselves have plenty?

            One side is actually doing it out of material desperation, the other out of political convenience, is all I’m saying.

            • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Hamas charter literally states that their goals are only attainable through jihad. The motivation is not “material desperation” but Israel’s destruction. Israel’s actions have helped radicalize people toward Hamas but Hamas goals are expressly not self defense.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hamas is literally fascist, yes. But then you also have to ask why they have an easy time recruiting fighters instead of being a handful of hateful creeps in a nondescript shisha bar. Without all that energy created from desperation, Hamas would have precious little to work with. Heck without Fatah corruption they wouldn’t have anything to work with.

                • Custodian1623@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The actions of the IDF and the state don’t justify mass murder of civilians. All that accomplishes is poking the bear. Israel is oppressive against the people of Palestine but by no means do two wrongs make a right.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not justifying. I’m explaining. And the explanation is that Israel drives Palestinians to desperation and instincts break through. A cornered cat won’t care whether it’s a bear cornering her she’s going to scratch that fucker no matter what.

                    Also history has shown that not poking that particular bear doesn’t make it any friendlier. Frankly speaking at this point the only thing that could get us out of the conundrum, I think, is an Israeli civil war, with the settlers on the losing side.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Like Israel is doing by depriving Gaza of the necessities for life even though they themselves have plenty?

              My dislike of the policies of Israel’s government is not relevant. Israeli citizens are not currently massacring Palestinians and parading their bodies through the streets.

              This is not equal, this terrorism does not help Palestine, and excusing it is disgusting.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                this terrorism does not help Palestine

                I never said it did.

                and excusing it is disgusting.

                I’m not excusing I’m explaining.

                This is not equal,

                Indeed. As said: On the one side a cat in a corner, on the other someone pinning it down. Who is at fault when claws go flying?

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Animals are not human. Human beings have agency. These people chose to be terrorists. There is no excuse, and the victims of their terrorism are not to blame.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Humans are animals, push any of us far enough and you’ll see. As said: It’s easy to moralise from your desk.

                    …also, who are you talking about? Cutting off an area’s water supply counts as terrorism in my book. Please clarify.