• SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As the article notes, writers for her show are governed under a separate contract which was not being struck. It was actually a cool move on her part to respond to the backlash with further solidarity and push back the show, since no one on her team was actually called to strike.

      Also I find it weird that it’s “struck” and not “striked” like how being hanged is very different from being hung.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          in fact, she tried to keep it secret and didn’t tell them, instead

          She literally posted about it on social media, which is how you know about it lol

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As the article notes, writers for her show are governed under a separate contract which was not being struck.

        No, you’re misunderstanding that portion of the article.

        The Actors agreement allows talk shows to continue with SAG/AFTRA members, but the writers strike covered the writers on the show. They tried to restart production without writers (which is possible, Late Night did it in the last writers strike).

        So even though the Actors strike is still happening, shows like this can use union actors (like Drew Barrymore) now. And they can use union writers now, too, because the writers strike is over.