Hey! Thanks to the whole Reddit mess, I’ve discovered the fediverse and its increidible wonders and I’m lovin’ it :D

I’ve seen another post about karma, and after reading the comments, I can see there is a strong opinion against it (which I do share). I’d love to hear your opinions, what other method/s would you guys implement? If any ofc

    • Dark Arc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is that aspect of karma of “if you’ve got negative karma, you’re probably intolerable” but I’m not sure how much that helps in practice vs just banning people. Karma can also filter out fresh accounts for high spam communities, ofc, that doesn’t work perfectly either…

      • Invalid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Karma farming has always been one of the worst aspects of the other place. Repost bots will sustain them long after the humans are all gone.

        Throwaways are still an issue with banning.

        Some kind of participation based scoring would just bring us back to farming and alienates lurkers.

        Account age is unreliable.

        Hmm… I hate leaving the burden on mods but karma has too many negatives.

    • Machinist3359@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree 90%, downvotes shouldn’t have that much weight. That said, comments which are abusive or hateful probably should have long term consequences for the user, even if they are themselves not worthy of a ban. Maybe reputation can be a “strike” for number of reported comments.

      To be clear, here I’m thinking of “dogwhistle” comments which individually are plausibly fine, but in aggregate indicate this person is up to no good.