• Brawndo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also assume all the risk of the property too. Tenants can leave as they please but landlords are stuck with the property if the market turns.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Landlords also absorb all the risk if the tenants skip out on two months of rent and leave the unit with no appliances, dog piss stained floors, a body sized hole in the bedroom wall, a toilet that leaked noticably but never reported resulting in extensive water damage, etc.

        While its guaranteed that theres a lot of shitty landlords out there, and a ton of price-gouging corporate management companies (who are the real problem these days eith affordability)… I’m fully convinced every user who says “landlords are the devil” are they, themselves, the Tenants from Hell who do not pay the building they live in the tiniest modicum of respect; then wonder why every landlord hates them and hassles them.

          • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh yeah. I’ve lived it and breathed it… a few times. Cleaning up a ruined house fucking sucks and it’s expensive too. Makes me wonder how some people stay alive with how quickly they wreck stuff.

        • Russianranger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed, there has to be a level of understanding. Just because you live in a space and pay rent doesn’t mean you can go wild and let the place crawl with refuse and roaches. I have an upstairs neighbor in my apartment complex that is the quintessential definition of the renter from hell. And we get all their roaches even though we keep the place spotless. And not to paint the landlords as martyrs here, as they have their own issues, but some people have a bad case of main character complex and think the rest of us that have to suffer with the stench and infestation are just the NPCs.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          What risk? A landlord that isn’t a complete idiot would have set aside some of their extortion money or required a deposit.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one forced them to be a landlord. Tenants have very little choice. Why is there even a comparison here?

        • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the 2008 economic crisis never happened? Where I live (Europe) houses are actually going down in value right now too.

          • doleo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Going down fractionally, after having grown an incredible amount in the last 3 years. Please don’t swallow this obvious bullshit. Prices are high, prohibitively high, and are going to stay that way until everyone bar a few is forced to rent.

      • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh wow boo hoo, they have so much risk 😔 they have an entire house that they can sell at any time, who someone else is paying the mortgage of. Oh, the horror! If the market should crash they’ll lose the equity another person paid!

        Really the landlords are the victims here, not the tenants paying their mortgage for them plus a little extra for profits. Clearly the tenants have committed the crime of not having good enough credit for a loan, or the crime of not having enough for a down payment, so they aren’t worthy of owning property.

        No no it’s the landlord who has the real problems, because they could ein a shaky financial situation of “selling the second house iown” if the market dips!

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The places I’ve stayed so far pay a company to deal with these issues in place of the owner.

      I can’t speak on what that costs, however.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Management companies typically take a percentage of the monthly rent (can vary wildly from 8% up to 25%+). This also means they have a vested interest in increasing a building’s rent by the maximum legally allowed amount every single year, because it means they make more without doing additional work.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s genuinely not easy, both my parents have owned rental properties at some point in their lives, as a retirement investment. I’d never consider a rental property as an investment myself as a result of what I’ve seen tenants do to a property.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you have multiple properties you hire someone to do that work. ‘Landlords’ include property companies that own hundreds of units, which is the majority of ownership in the US. Do you think the owners of these companies are doing maintenance and dealing with tenants? The executives are in effect the landlords, and all the work they do is figure out how to make more money off of their company’s investments, aka figure out how to better extract income from tenants.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What does it mean to be a landlord then? Are you saying the properties owned by these companies have no landlord? I don’t doubt it’s a tough job to run a company, I still don’t think that justifies the amount of our profits we give up to ensure we have shelter.