• NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Based on the above image, I’d say its the guy who sees a demand for septic tank maintenance and is willing to do that work for pay. The first issue is the disparity between the workers and the business owner. but if they’re the same, you don’t have that issue.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who does the marketing and bookkeeping for that one guy? Are you saying that every single professional should be their own sole proprietorship?

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, maybe sole proprietor works. Keep the communities relatively, everyone picks up an array of skills, you don’t need marketing to know jimbob and Lisa are the only people skilled w plumbing stuff in the community. And I think it’s pretty common for soleprop to do their own bookkeeping, if it’s really done at all.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          How does society build spacecraft, or do high energy physics research in this scenario? Sounds like paradise if you’re willing to stay in an agrarian society, but you have to be comfortable with life expectancy dropping like a rock from its current levels, because there would be no MRI machines, or gene therapy. These things are not the work of individuals, or even small groups working on handshake agreements. Contrary to how it might sound, I’m really not attacking the premise, I just want to make sure everyone understands what their advocating when they imply that this is how society should be.

          • x4740N@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do people want to become doctors, astronauts, invent medical devices, invent new technology, etc

            When you give people the choice to actually contribute to society with the things they enjoy doing then they will

            And menial tasks such as emptying a septic tank can be automated

            Right now the only way people can contribute to society in a way they enjoy is if they have enough money to do so, if not they are forced into doing jobs that they don’t enjoy and drain them

              • the_inebriati@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I can think of a worse future than one where our rapid advances in technology and productivity afford us the ability to create more art and beauty without fear of destitution.

              • ObsidianBlk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are always some that will “do nothing” if given the freedom to live as they want. Most won’t. What exactly will take the place of a 9 to 5 in a post Capitalist world? No idea. I’m not that smart. Humans do need more than simple pixie dust and altruistic motivations to do more than the most bare bones of things. That said, whatever the next system may be, it need not threaten peoples security (housing, food, and medical care) to be functional.

            • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right now you can contribute to society by doing work that matters which does not always require individual expenses.

              For example bar none the single most important job in any developed society is water purification. Working at the water utility is something you can do that benefits everyone and has no cost to yourself.

              The second most critical task is waste management which requires no money from the worker either.

              Im not being pedantic here. The claim you have to be wealthy to contribute is false

              • x4740N@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Did you read my comment properly

                Some people may enjoy waste management or water purification but not all people do

                People also have to lay for the cost of transport, bills, taxes, food, shelter, etc

                People want to contribute to society in ways which they enjoy and tasks like water purification and waste management can be largely automated with notifications sent out to people overseeing the automation if there’s an issue

                • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, you think we can completely automate water systems and trash collection? What planet do you live on because those have NEVER been automated anywhere.

                  I think you live in a dreamworld where people can just do whatever task fulfills them and all the unpleasant jobs are magically taken care of.

                  • x4740N@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Do you think waste management is only the garbage people who come to collect your bin rubbish every week

                    I think those garbage people need to come see you more often because it’s clear you’re making trash here in the comment section by arguing I’m bad faith

          • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it was really feeling like you were just being contrarian. Which led me to not really try at all to engage with you further. But since it now seems you’re coming at this in good faith….

            I’m 100% on the same page with you about advanced technologies and science, though I do wonder if our individual happiness wouldn’t be greater with a bit less technology. The harnessing of tech/science to extract value out of people at the expense of mental health (corporate social media for example) is a cost that is hard to weigh against the advantages of modern health sciences.

            It’d be nice if we could find a way to achieve those things without the need for obscene concentration of wealth and this global tragedy of the commons perpetuated by companies and individuals that are so far removed from the impacts of their actions.

            There must be a letter way, and I have no clue how to figure it out or how we’d implement it… but the way things are now just… doesn’t feel good.