• Forbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t have any nuanced discussion here! Glad to see people such as yourself engaging in reductionism and shutting down thinking, because all interactions online have to be boiled down to five words TL;DR pithy sound bites.

      Leave the shit on Twitter, we can do better here.

      • datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually typed out a more lengthy response to someone here already, read more responses/viewed the vote counts, and then wrote this top level comment pointing out how backwards this community’s views are. No one is directly supporting assaulting children, but as I wrote elsewhere: “why do we value the sexual gratification of pedos higher than the potential safety of children?”

        • MikuNPC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Who the heck is proposing we value that? Everyone is saying we value the safety of real children which may entail keeping artificial CP legal.

          Also it’s a victimless crime so punishments dealt out are criticized heavily, and for good reason.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You clearly have chosen not to understand the assignments people are making in this thread. Either that or you’re choosing to misrepresent them. Literally nobody is supporting sexual assault of children or anyone else. But hey, don’t let that stop you from gloating about how morally superior you are.

    • Ismayil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Comments in this thread makes me laugh especially the ‘its not pedophila’ parts LOOOOOOOOOOOL