• Cabrio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You can tell the poster is American because they blame the government involved for all of these except the US, where they blamed the CIA.

  • Erika2rsis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Was there a massacre in Tiananmen Square?”

    —“No.”

    “Were people killed elsewhere in Beijing?”

    —“…Ermh…”

    Ahem. I am asking you if people were killed in the area immediately surrounding Tiananmen Square, even if nobody was killed in the square itself.”

    —“The protesters in Tiananmen Square left after negotiations with the PLA. There was no bloodshed in Tiananmen Square.”

    “I understand that, but were people killed elsewhere in Beijing?

    —“Nowhere in Beijing were student protestors specifically targeted.”

    “Well, were non-students targeted, and were any students injured or killed without being targeted?”

    —“Hey did you know that the Three Gorges Dam is the world’s largest—”

    “Gongchandang, my friend, I am begging you.”

    —“…Force may have been used when provoked by attacks.”

    “May force have also been used unprovoked? Could it have been that the protesters felt like they were provoked first, because you were sending tanks past the barricades that they’d put up?”

    —“I mean… you know… uhh…”

    “Gongchandang. Were you scared that the occupation of Beijing and the potential of a workers’ revolt would threaten the survival of socialism in China, by presenting a still-socialist alternative to your rule, because societal division particularly among the less politically literate could be (and was) exploited by outside forces?”

    —“OUR YOUTH ARE VULNERABLE TO IMPERIALIST PROPAGANDA, OK‽ ALSO, TANK MAN DIDN’T GET RUN OVER. SEE. HE WAS PULLED AWAY BY A PASSERBY. NOT RUN OVER.”

  • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Australian’s about their treatment of aborigines first nation Australians

    The Irish about mother and baby homes.

    China about Uyghurs

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t a bunch of Muslim countries actually ask China about Uyghurs (and even visit Xinjiang) and they left unanimously content with the response?

      • jcit878@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        should be easy enough for you to provide a legitimate source to this claim.

        please note the word “legitimate”

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I bet they did according to Xi and the CCP, but not in reality.

        Even if they did, they’re probably faking it because trade with China is more important to them than human rights, just like the US and Saudi Arabia or the other Western countries and the US…

    • TechLich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “aborigines” is not a great word to use these days. It’s generally seen as pretty offensive to Indigenous Australians as it’s a bit dehumanising and comes from colinisers who treated people like animals.

      Better to go with “First Nations people”, “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people” or “Indigenous Australians.”

      But yes, they’ve been treated (and in many cases continue to be treated) pretty horribly.

        • Spendrill@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Blaming the Catholic Church is a good way to start but the argument that Irish people were led astray by the Church is pretty much the same argument as those who seek to divorce the Wehrmacht from complicity in SS atrocities. In both cases the answer is that they shared vital infrastructure with each other and ranking officials could have stopped the excesses, which they had full knowledge of, if they’d have disagreed with it.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah tiananmen is such a meme at this point. You can tell when people base their entire politics on memes and don’t bother reading and searching on their own. Tiananmen is an issue they won’t step mentioning.

        • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think the other comment on this thread addressed it pretty well: https://hexbear.net/comment/4003110

          I’m pretty skeptical about taking political positions from memes, and when I’ve done my own research on this, I failed to find valid reasons that this issue should get the attention that the Internet gives it. There are many other issues that are worth my attention. This one isn’t.

            • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Plenty of sources provided in there (ny times, reuters, etc), but if you were the kind to examine evidence, you wouldn’t be here anyways.

                • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I love how you ignored everything in the article except what could possibly agree with your viewpoint. On your first quote, the link they cite does not exist anymore. In the video you linked, I hear gunshots but don’t see people running away from them. As someone from a country that saw unrest and shooting at protests, I can tell you that people immediately start running when they’re shot at, emptying the area. Not continue to March nonchalantly.

                  In the end, I want to conclude with saying that I didn’t deny that anyone died (although the comment I linked does seem to imply that. My apologies for not clarifying, as I was only using them to back up my opinion). What I said in the original comment is that it is not an issue worth my attention. I’ve seen and read about so many government rerpression, and this is far from being in the top 10. It’s an unnecessarily magnified issue.

          • Gamey@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not even going to click on that, the domain tells me everything I need to know considering the topic we talk about!

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, it’s a variety of sourced quotes from respected journalists who were there. You probably should read them all, if only so you can point out to the Hexbears where they mention all the people who died in the area around the Square. The sources mostly say “no one got gunned down literally in the Square.”

              In any case, it’s fucking weird to obsess over it. It’s like trying to give Biden crap about the Kent State Massacre while he’s rounding up all the Mormons.

            • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Plenty of evidence cited there from multiple sources. You don’t have to open it, but the evidence is there shall you question it.

              • Gamey@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Abother user made a very good comment about this under my post, might be worth checking out!

                • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I agree with that commenter. I do not claim that “nothing happened”. I said this in my earlier comments, that I just don’t think it’s a problem worth my attention.

          • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Numerous military buses, trucks, armored vehicles, and tanks being burned by the “peaceful” protesters. Sometimes the soldiers were allowed to escape, and sometimes they were brutally killed by the protesters. Numerous protesters were armed with Molotov cocktails and even guns.

            Sounds like a full blown insurrection.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I knew this was going to be the only one people tried to deny in this thread, but I didn’t figure it would be OP

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US about indigenous Americans.

    Oh wait, they made hundreds of movies about killing them.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do you mean don’t ask the UK about African interment camps?

    Our lovely Tory government spent most of last year proud of trying to deport asylum seekers to fucking Rwanda. Like it was some sort of vote winner.

    • Spendrill@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s unfair to suggest that the UK Government doesn’t like you asking about African internment camps.

      They also don’t like you asking about:

      • the conditions under which refugees are currently housed, give you a clue it kind of rhymes historically with internment camps
      • Various Indian famines that were caused or exacerbated by colonial rule
      • role in slave trade. Yes they ended the slave trade… by compensating slave owners. Also started the fucking thing.
      • That time we basically stole an entire island from its people to put an airbase there.
      • linked to the internment camps, pretty much anything Churchill did prior to the Second World War and after it also.
      • the undercover activities of the police investigating environmental groups e.g. having children by the people they were surveilling.

      There’s probably several pages of this but I’ve only just woken up.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The British Empire once covered over a quarter of the Earth’s land area. Even the Mongols never managed that.

        And by “once”, it’s not ancient history. It was 1920.

        It’s horrifying, and we’re almost certainly responsible for more suffering than any other country on Earth, but also kind of impressive. There are just 22 countries we never invaded.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t look at us, it was the Spanish that found it.

            Well, after all those people that were already on it, obviously. But they hardly count. They weren’t white. But according to Americans, neither are the Spanish, so…

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t ask the UK anything about their troubling history with black people or slavery unless it’s to mention that they were one of the first countries to stop making black people property. They get really mad if you mention anything but that.

  • Gray@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    How a person reacts to being asked about the version of these things most close to them is telling. If they get defensive and deny the event happened, I would hesitate to trust their opinion on other things. Clearly that person bases their opinions on what they want to be true rather than reality. That’s the kind of person whose ideology would likely lead to another event to be ashamed of. If, on the other hand, they admit it was a horrible thing and agree that people should be educated on it and that steps should be taken to prevent it from ever happening again, then I’m more likely to take their opinion seriously and believe that they can be part of the conversations we need to happen to create a better world.

  • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Thailand:

    • 6 October
    • Bloody May
    • The K–g Never Smiles
    • The Devil’s Discus
    • “Unfortunately Some People Died”