• Dran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spelling and grammar are important. Language is only as useful as it is commonly and uniformly understood.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. Purposeful ignorance of spelling and grammar is basically saying to the person you’re typing to “I’m too lazy to learn simple concepts so you’ll have to spend extra time trying to parse my sentences”

        • DigitalPaperTrail@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          90% of the time I see grammar nazis doing their thing, it’s never about protecting the “sanctity” of grammar - it’s more about exerting control and attempting to enjoy the feeling of being right.

          The other 10% of the time are from people that know its purpose is to be a vehicle for the communication of ideas, and will also make up statistics.

          I love me some irony, and felt this comment train was more engaging than the post itself; so I’m contributing to its further development.

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s kind an argument for not caring about spelling and grammar. We can all tell what Xepp meant. The principle at hand is why linguists say that insisting on rigid grammar and spelling is pointless. Also, language evolves… otherwise we’d be saying thy and thou. Dialects other than the ‘prestige dialect’ spoken and written by people with the highest access to education are considered perfectly legitimate because all that matters is whether the listener can understand…

      • Dran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bill helped his brother, jack, off a horse.

        Bill helped his brother jack off a horse

        It doesn’t take much sometimes for a sentence to completely change meaning,l; at best we knew what he meant but struggled through it slightly.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought we were meant to be inclusive now? There’s a good chunk of us that literally can’t look past a sentence that’s like a car crash. It’s like an old vinyl record that’s got a scratch, our eyes keep jumping back to the horrible spelling and reading it again the same way you’d look at a dismembered corpse at the side of the road, despite not actually wanting to

        Inclusiveness for purists!!!