• Roundcat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Japan: We have medical knowledge from… experiments, and we’ll forever be your economic bitch!

  • Skoobie@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Promising a deal that includes citizenship, a house, a salary, and an administrative position to a Nazi scientist in exchange for their work and knowledge such that one’s country can gain ground in a cold war is absolutely fine. It’s absolutely totally fine.

    Following through with the deal after getting the goods from the Nazi is not. Shoot the Nazi. You always shoot the Nazi.

      • Skoobie@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I apologize if I’m misreading. Are you suggesting that it would be wrong to shoot a Nazi?

        • collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          After promising safety in exchange for cooperation, and presumably without having convicted them of anything besides their former party affiliation?

          • Skoobie@lemmy.film
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, now I will admit to there having been a potential nuance. I certainly would want a trial before an execution, for instance. But I also think it would be wrong to assume these scientists were completely morally innocent. Maybe I could be persuaded from my earlier opinion of “You always shoot a Nazi” but there needs to be something to show. A diary entry saying “I’m not sure about this Hitler fella.” Something.

            • Flumsy@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              Either trial him OR make a deal. You cant make a deal and after getting what you want proceed to trial him.

            • _iamnotcutoutforthis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              What you’re suggesting is stooping to the level of the nazi cruelty by a complete breach of agreement even after the other party has fulfilled their terms. Also what was that pathetic attempt at baiting the other guy by saying: “aRe yOu SuGgEsTiNg iT iS wRoNg tO sHoOt NaZiS?!!”. Like that wasn’t even the point of the other guy.

        • DarkenLM@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think many of the scientists weren’t Nazis, but rather forced to work for the Nazis, fearing for their and their family’s lives. I could be wrong though, it has been a while since I’ve investigated that matter.

          • Skoobie@lemmy.film
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            To be frank, it would be hard to siphon out truth from fiction at this point from personal accounts. That said, of course I distinguish between a forced Nazi accomplice and a sympathizer. I am not suggesting that they should be treated the same. I am suggesting that the U.S. was so zealous in its efforts to defeat the Russians that it wasn’t making distinctions.

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              didn’t Hitler get the idea of concentration camps from the US?

              I think you are idolizing US in this a bit too much, they weren’t exactly much better than the nazis.

              I mean I know for sure Eugenics were a popular idea in the US during that time, PoC were treated terribly etc.

  • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actually, none of the scientists were found guilty of a crime. (And several of them were investigated.)

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You actually believe that? The people who claim that people like Werner von Braun didn’t commit any crimes are the CIA and Braun himself. All of the records from Germany were destroyed. It’s essentially just taking his word on it to believe he was only involved because “he had to be.”

      He was literally a member of the SS, the wing of the nazi government that was directly responsible for the Holocaust. He was photographed repeatedly with himmler himself, in uniform. He claimed that those were just ceremonial photos that he had to participate in the keep his career. He also claimed not to agree with the Nazis politically.

      Why would you believe anything that a member of the SS said? Especially one as important to the Nazis as von Braun was.

      Of fucking course he was never found guilty of any war crimes, the US was actively trying to recruit him. They didn’t want to prosecute their newest asset, a man who directly led to the US becoming the globally dominant force it became during the space race. He was useful so the US government deliberately didn’t investigate him seriously, took him at his word that he totally wasn’t a real nazi, and then used him to invent more rockets for them.