• fluke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    242
    ·
    1 year ago

    The idea that Elon Musk and Andrew Tate think that publically backing him helps quash any suggestion of bad actions is laughable.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not surprising either. This stuff usually only ever comes to light, when the talent is no longer profitable.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lawl my partner and I were talking about a WEEK ago, saying we were surprised and happy that he’s apparently not raped anyone, or at least no allegations have come up.

      This article is extremely relevant to that convo bahahaha

  • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once upon a time I actually liked Russell Brand. Thought he was intelligent and quite in touch with the ways of the world despite his eccentric character. He truly lost the plot when covid came around, although it wasn’t the first time he’d talked absolute shite.

    In hindsight, it’s not really a surprise that he’d be this kind of person.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I know a lot of people thought he was a reasonably smart dude with some interesting insights. But when you think about it he’s always been very superficial. There’s not much depth to any of his takes. He’s just charismatic and speaks like he keeps a pocket thesaurus in his jacket.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        He a junkie you would see rambling at a bus stop incoherently. The difference is an expanded vocabulary and a he’s been on TV.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          He was funny at one point. But he never grew past the need for the attention and didn’t branch out of teenager years.

      • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        When I was poor and I complained about inequality they said I was bitter. Now I’m rich and I complain about inequality they say I’m a hypocrite. I’m starting to think they just don’t want to talk about inequality. —Russell Brand

        Still one of my favorite quotes, it’s unfortunate that I won’t really be able to use it any more.

        Brand used to be a legit socialist back in the day. The longer he had money, the harder I think was for him to continue to understand the struggle of the common people. Either that or its audience capture like what happened to Dave Rueben.

        The YouTube channel the Kavernacle has done some good coverage on his drift to the right.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          He definitely didn’t come up with that line, I’m sure you could find an attribution to something virtually identical said a century ago, and several times since.
          I just watched a program about this, and he was a creep from the get go.
          A guy vaguely understanding class struggles doesn’t make him a socialist nor a good guy.

          • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m pretty sure he described himself as a socialist once upon a time. I’m not one to gate keep what people call themselves.

            But yeah just because he’s a socialist that doesn’t make him a good person. Marx probably had an unclaimed child with his servant girl.

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hitler called himself a socialist too, that’s a pretty low bar… 🤦‍♀️

              All you’ve done so far is attempt to derail the conversation about Brand being a rapist…

              • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry that’s not my intention. Do you think it would be best if we delete this thread?

                I was just working through how my perception of him had changed over the years. I don’t want to downplay his alleged crimes.

                • DessertStorms@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I appreciate that you didn’t mean to, but making it about him and whatever good he supposedly did, in a conversation about the several women he raped (and however many more he “just” assaulted), is at best highly inappropriate (and at worst is a well known derailing tactic used by those looking to defend a rapist and/or discredit his victims). Deleting the thread probably won’t do much, but learning from this for the future will.

                  Part of rape culture is the massively false idea that “nice guys” don’t rape, ignoring the fact that many rapists and abusers are experts at manipulating everyone around them (rapists “infiltrating” leftist circles, especially feminist ones, to gain access to victims, as well as the language to disarm their defences, is sadly not at all unusual).

                  I would highly recommend watching the Dispatches episode that aired about this last night if you can. In several of his performances/appearances he basically admits to putting an act on to get people to ignore how shitty he really is (as well as graphic descriptions of what we now know were some of his assaults, which he used as part of his comedy routine).

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Marx was an utter piece of shit in many ways. He just had some very good ideas. I’ve always wondered how many of them can be attributed to Engles though.

    • stillwater@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He used to eloquently talk about more straightforward issues to do with class struggle. The problem is when he decides to take that approach to science but then found himself going against it, and doubling down.

      It’s basically how a lot of commentators get into a bizarre rabbit hole and come out with some wild ideas. It’s a basic trap that many of them fall for.

      But that said he’s always had a reputation for being a “playboy”, so this isn’t really a surprise. Lots of dudes from back when he was on top have turned out to be really shitty.

      • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is shit he was doing more than ten years ago.

        You can’t blame this shit on lockdown, he’s always been a failure of a human being, it’s just now we’re finding out details.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never liked him much, and that’s not a “I knew he was out there raping”, that I didn’t know. But personality-wise he was basically an egocentric rockstar who thought he knew it all and everyone not agreeing with his views and sense of humour were just too stupid.

      And turns out, he is behaving even more like a 80s rockstar than I thought.

          • ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, it’s also why his movie career (at least as a comic lead) started in 2008 and was dead by the middle of 2011. He’s got no range and audiences were only willing to pay to see Russell Brand being “Russell Brand in a different outfit” so many times before he wore out his welcome.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      I noticed that people who are using recreational drugs are disproportionally concerned about vaccine safety, which I find quite amusing.

      • stillwater@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’d find higher rates among Christian Conservatives and they’re a pretty anti-drug group.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never said that’s the only group though.

          It is just surprising to me that you would get concerns about injecting yourself with not well tested medicine from that specific group.

          • Hyperreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find it entirely unsurprising.

            The amount of vegan, organic, health-obsessed, non-GMO twats I know, who happily snort coke or do ecstacy during the weekend is huge.

            I can only surmise they’re not true believers, they’re just boring people who think going on about it makes them more interesting than they actually are.

          • stillwater@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s just that out of the various things about Russell Brand, the recreational drug user is going to be one of the lesser reasons why he went into anti-vaxx territory.

            Not that he’s a Christian Conservative but he’s adopted a parallel to their ways of regarding medical science, where it’s a lot of sealioning questions, little actual medical journal research, and all the confidence of a SAHM Facebook mom who gets all her information from Facebook.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just waiting for the study that shows COVID infection makes certain people less empathetic and more paranoid. There’s just too much of it happening to not be biological IMO.

    • rosymind@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      She was 16, so yeah, he’s right: he was banging a child.

      Even if he isn’t convicted of the others (one was treated at a clinic after the assault) dating a 16 year old when you’re 30 is gonna get you some time.

      Assuming this is all true (I do believe them, but it’s up to judge/jury to decide) but he somehow manages to get out of this, his reputation is in the toilet

      • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 year ago

        16 is above the age of consent in the UK as far as I know, so the issue wouldn’t be the dating of a sixteen year old, it’d be the apparent rampant rapes and assaults regardless of age.

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not to dog on the UK but maybe they should raise that a little, it’s incredibly easy for an adult to take advantage of a 16 year old, not even just sexually.

          • Nath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s actually the USA who has an unusually high age of consent. Most of us have an age of consent of 16 and a drinking age of 18.

            I don’t exactly think we should raise it, but I sure wouldn’t be against a Romeo and Juliet style amendment. I remember dating an 18 year old when I was 21, and that felt like a big gap. I can’t begin to imagine 16 to 30+. Though that wouldn’t be illegal here either^*.

            * We have exceptions if the older person is in a position of trust like a teacher, coach etc. Then it’s illegal.

        • rosymind@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’m American and we tend to think the world and laws revolve around us. My bad! (Still 16 and 30 tho…)

      • Doorbook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The thing is, if this happens 4 times, most likely there are more who might speak up. The thing with these victims, in many cases, they think they are the only one. Knowing there might be others, would increase the chances of them to go public with their experience which might be even worse.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      There was a Dispatches program on about this tonight, and at some point they note that later in his career Brand would do charity work exclusively to benefit women, and Kutcher was my first thought.
      Not saying he’s done anything, but so often men claim to be feminists as a smoke screen to hide abusive behaviour (“he would never, look at all the good he’s done!”) and/or access victims.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we make a list of right wingers that aren’t disgusting pieces of shit? Will be much quicker.

  • BillDoor@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know we have a real problem in our society when these women haven’t been able to come forward with these allegations until the press have contacted them.

    If they fear coming forward after being assaulted by someone who is hardly discreet about being a sexual predator, what must it be like for the victims of more outwardly respectable public figures?

  • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Completely and utterly damning. He’s a rapist. I hope an investigation and conviction follows this reporting. Also maybe now’s the time to codify that 16 year olds shouldn’t be fair game for 30 year old men.

    • themajesticdodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      “He’s a rapist.”

      If I wrote an article about you with an accusation of rape, would that also make you a rapist? Is that the standard of proof required?

      • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends, does your article reference a verified report from a rape crisis centre and a text apologising for the rape from the rapist?

      • JoBo@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        With several accusations of rape, from different people describing very similar circumstances, echoing his ‘comedy’, with one receiving apologies from a man who heard her screaming as the assault was occurring and was too afraid to intervene.

        Your knee-jerk apologism for this slimy predator reflects very badly on you. You can’t even be bothered to research the accusations you’re dismissing. Take a good look at yourself, it is not too late to change.

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    What an absolute asshole monster

    That Times article should come with a trigger warning, it contains descriptions of the assaults.

  • Mago@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a single person with a brain is surpriced. The guy is a GLOWING red flag.