• Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although I tend to agree, I think this was also the correct decision. He would have distracted from the good work the organisation does.

    • Anus B. Samus @feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      While the organization might do good work, I see far too many red flags in their demands. They are lobbying against end-to-end encryption for chat messages. The argument is that child abusers can hide behind encryption. While this is true, a ban would lead to no privacy for everyone.

      The real-life equivalent would be mandatory microphones for everyone so authorities could catch child molesters more easily. Good cause but horrible methodology. And of course, if they succeed, criminals will move to other, maybe their own-built, messaging systems that still have encryption.

      https://www.thorn.org/blog/encryption-trend-threatens-child-safety-gains/